Taanish Enterprises v. the Commissioner of Customs (Chennai-Ii) Import
Constitution of India, Article 226 – Customs – provisional release
Case brief
What is this about?
Madras High Court common order dated 11-06-2026 (M. Dhandapani, J.) in WP Nos. 21942 & 21946 of 2026 (Taanish Enterprises; M/s.Growlam Office Private Limited) v. Commissioner/Addl./Deputy Commissioner of Customs, Chennai: mandamus under Article 226 for provisional release of imported second-hand digital multifunction print & copying machines (MFDs) consignments; BIS registration mandatory / restricted imports objection; MeiTy Compulsory Registration Order exemption Clause 8(d) (over 80 kgs, Highly Specialised Equipment); FTP 2023 Para 2.31(1)(d) secondhand capital goods; simple bond for 100% enhanced value plus applicable GST; follows earlier batch order in W.P.No.29418 of 2024 etc. dated 10.07.2025 (para 32 conditions); Bills of Entry 9254179, 9320117, 9314930; Customs Act, 1962; four-week and two-week timelines; provisional release subject to final adjudication.
What did the court decide?
Both writ petitions disposed of in line with the earlier order in W.P.No.29418 of 2024 etc. batch dated 10.07.2025, with directions: (i) Customs Department, Chennai to pass orders for provisional release of the goods on conditions it deems fit under the Customs Act, 1962 within four weeks of receipt of a copy of the order; (ii) upon fulfilment of those conditions, provisional release of the goods to the respective writ petitioners within two weeks thereafter; (iii) provisional release subject to final adjudication, which may reverse it; (iv) connected writ miscellaneous petitions (W.M.P.Nos.23786 & 23795 of 2026) closed; no costs.