Karthik Velusamy Vs The District collector

The Chief General Manager Hindustan petroleum corporation Limited, South zone, Thalamuthu Natarajan building 8, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai District 600 004

¶14

__________ Page1 of 6

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WP No. 21736 of 2026

¶17

The Controller of Explosives petroleum and Explosives safety Organization (PESO) South Circle office, 2nd Floor Shastri Bhavan, 216 Haddows road, Nungambakakm Chenani District 600 006

¶18

P. C. Sathish S/o Chinnasamy, Proprietor of HPCL Retail Outlet, 16C, Hospital Road, back side of RMR Godwon, Kavindapadi Village, Bhavani Taluk Erode District 638 455

¶19

..Respondent(s)

¶20

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioners representation dated 25.05.2026 seeking recall / revocation of the No objection Certificate issued in respect of the proposed Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) Retail outlet in survey no 235/3A and 235/3B after affording an opportunity of hearing to all necessary parties.

¶21

For Petitioner(s): M/S.L.P.SHAMUGASUNDARAM

¶22

For Respondent(s): MR.J.V.SAKTHI BALAKRISHNAN, FOR GOVT. FOR R1 TO R3

¶23

Page2 of 6

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

WP No. 21736 of 2026

¶26

ORDER

¶27

The present writ petition is filed praying for a writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner’s representation dated 25.05.2026 seeking to recall / revocation of the No objection Certificate issued in respect of the proposed Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) Retail outlet in Survey No: 235/3A and 235/3B after affording an opportunity of hearing to all necessary parties.

¶28

The learned Counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the representation submitted by petitioner would be considered and appropriate orders would be passed after affording the petitioner a reasonable opportunity of hearing, in accordance with law within the time period to be fixed by this Court.

¶29

In view of the same, taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the limited relief sought for in this Writ Petition, there shall be a direction to the Respondents 1 to 3 to consider the petitioner's representations, on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and other interested persons, within a period of three (3) weeks from the date of uploading of web copy of this order without waiting for the certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any views with

¶30

Page3 of 6

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

WP No. 21736 of 2026

¶33

regard to the merits of the representation and it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the representations on its own merits and in accordance with law.

¶34