Dismissed¶20

S.Suryapandian v. The Senior

Madras HC16 Feb 2026WP/21104/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural disposal only — no legal proposition to cite. Madras High Court, Writ Petition (Article 226, certiorari) by S.Suryapandian against the Senior Divisional Security Commissioner RPF/Chennai (1st respondent) and Assistant Security Commissioner/TNPM (2nd respondent), targeting orders vide No.M/XP/158/SP/NGO/135/17 dated 23.02.2018 and 21.05.2018. Dismissed as withdrawn on counsel's (D.Geetha) endorsement; no order as to costs; decided 16.02.2026 by Hemant Chandangoudar, J.; respondents represented by Additional Standing Counsel for Railways. No statutes analysed beyond the Article 226 invocation; no cases cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

None on merits; petition permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs. ¶20

S.Suryapandian Vs The Senior — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.No.21104 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 16.02.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

¶6

W.P.No.21104 of 2019

¶7

S.Suryapandian S/o.E.Chelladuraipandian

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

vs.

¶10

The Senior Divisional Security Commissioner RPF / Chennai 6^th Floor, DRM Office Park Town, Chennai-600 001.

¶11

Assistant Security Commissioner / TNPM Office of the Sr. Divisional Security Commissioner RPF / Chennai 6^th Floor, DRM Office Park Town, Chennai-600 001. … Respondents

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 2^nd respondent vide No.M/XP/158/SP/NGO/135/17 dated 23.02.2018 and the order passed by the 1^st respondent vide No.M/XP/158/SP/NGO/135/17 dated 21.05.2018, quash the same.

¶13

Page Nos.1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.21104 of 2019

¶16

For Petitioner : Ms.D.Geetha For Respondents : Mr.M.Vijay anand Additional Standing Counsel for Railways

¶17

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

Ms.D.Geetha, learned counsel on record for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect.

¶20

In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the captioned Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶21

16.02.2026

¶22

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No Speaking / Non-speaking

¶23

¶24

Page Nos.2/4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.P.No.21104 of 2019

¶27

¶28

The Senior Divisional Security Commissioner RPF / Chennai 6^th Floor, DRM Office Park Town, Chennai-600 001.

¶29

Assistant Security Commissioner / TNPM Office of the Sr. Divisional Security Commissioner RPF / Chennai 6^th Floor, DRM Office Park Town, Chennai-600 001.

¶30

Page Nos.3/4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.21104 of 2019

¶33

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.,

¶34

¶35

W.P.No.21104 of 2019

¶36