Disposed¶28

Roselin Mary v. The Accountant General of Tami lNadu

Madras HC6 Mar 2026WP/19054/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Family pension; mentally disordered sister; schizophrenia ('Schizopherenia'); representation dated 24.02.2022; Accountant General of Tamil Nadu; AGs office (Audit); Pay and Accounts Office (South); writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; fresh representation with supporting documents; medical certificates; consideration and orders within six weeks; filing within two weeks; writ petition closed; no costs; Madras High Court; Mohammed Shaffiq J.; WP No. 19054 of 2022; Roselin Mary; Deenal Elizabeth.

What did the court decide?

As recorded by the Court on the respondents' submission, on a fresh representation being made by the petitioner along with supporting documents, if any, the same would be considered and orders passed within six weeks of receipt. ¶22

Roselin Mary Vs The Accountant General of Tami lNadu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 19054 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 06-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ WP No. 19054 of 2022

¶6

Roselin Mary

¶7

W/o.Mr.P.S.Arockiasamy 3 / 112, E Type 28th Street, Sidco Nagar, Villivakkam, Chennai- 600 049.

¶8

..Petitioner(s)

¶9

¶10

The Accountant General of Tami lNadu Teynampet, Chennai- 600 018.

¶11

AGs office (Audit) Complex 361, Anna Salai, Rostrevor Garden, Teynampet, Chennai - 600 018.

¶12

Pay and Accounts Office (South) No.485, MTB building. Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai- 600 035.

¶13

..Respondent(s)

¶14

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the Respondent to consider the representation dated 24 / 02 / 2022 and further direct the Respondent to sanction petitioner fathers family pension to petitioner mentally disordered sister Mrs. Deenal Elizabeth

¶15

For Petitioner(s): Mr.M.Madhuprakash

¶16

For Respondent(s): Mr.L.Muralikrishnan for R1 & R2

¶17

__________ Page1 of 4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

WP No. 19054 of 2022

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The present Writ Petition is filed praying a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to consider the representation dated 24.02.2022 whereby the petitioner had requested for grant of family pension to Mrs. Deenal Elizabeth who according to the petitioner suffers from Schizopherenia.

¶22

The learned counsel for the respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the representation itself is insufficient / inadequate in as much as relevant medical certificates and documents have not been furnished and prima facie the petitioner may not be entitled to any family pension. Having said that the learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the petitioner may submit a fresh representation along with supporting documents, if any, and on such representation being made, the same would be considered and orders would be passed, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of such representation.

¶23

In view of the above submission by the learned counsel for respondents

¶24

1 and 2, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would file a fresh representation to the respondents 1 and 2 along with supporting documents, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

__________ Page2 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

WP No. 19054 of 2022

¶28