Dismissed¶20

B.Govindasamy v. the District Revenue Officer

Madras HC23 Mar 2026WP/18172/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP No. 18172 of 2023, Madras High Court, Justice Krishnan Ramasamy, 23-03-2026; writ petition under Article 226 Constitution of India; Writ of Mandamus; respondents 2 to 4 directed to dispose of pending proceedings; Na. Ka. 3840 / 2022 / A2 dated 01.08.2022; file of 3rd respondent Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur; petitioner B.Govindasamy; private respondent K.Sivasubramaniam (counsel N.Umapathi); government pleader T.K.Saravanan for R1 to 4; dispute settled before Trial Court; compromise memo produced; leave to withdraw; endorsement in case bundle; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no cost.

What did the court decide?

In view of counsel's report that the dispute was settled before the Trial Court (with compromise memo produced and a withdrawal endorsement filed), this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs.

B.Govindasamy Vs the District Revenue Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 18172 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 23-03-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 18172 of 2023

¶6

B.Govindasamy S/o.Late.Bhagavathygounder, No.8/3263, Amberikadu, Anna Nagar, P.N.Road, Neruperichal Village, Tiruppur-641 602.

¶7

Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The District Revenue Officer Tiruppur District. 2.The Sub-collector Tiruppur District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruppur District. 4.The Tahsildar Tiruppur (north) Taluk, Tiruppur District.

¶10

5.K.Sivasubramaniam S/o.Kumarasamy, No.2/242, Thalayari Thottam, Kattur, Pongallur, Palladam, Tiruppur - 641 667.

¶11

Respondent(s)

¶12

PRAYER

¶13

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 to 4 to dispose of the proceedings in Na. Ka. 3840 / 2022 / A2 dated 01.08.2022 pending on the file of the 3rd respondent at an early date.

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

WP No. 18172 of 2023

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.K.M.Hareesh, for M/s.PV Law Associates For Respondent(s): Mr.T.K.Saravanan, AGP for R1 to 4 Mr.N.Umapathi, for R5

¶17

ORDER

¶18

When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the

¶19

petitioner would submit that the dispute between the parties was duly settled before the Trial Court and he had also produced a copy of compromise memo before this Court. Hence, he seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition and in this regard, he had also made an endorsement in the case bundle.

¶20