N.Selvamani Vs The Secretary to the Government

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 01.06.2023 and 16.03.2024 for upgrading petitioner as Road Inspector Grade I on completion of 5 years of Service in the light of the order passed by this Honble High Court in WP (MD) No. 7738 to 7749 of 2008 dated 12.12.2012 which was upheld by the Bench of this Honble court in WA (MD) No. 262 to 273 of 2016 and the SLP Filed by the respondents in Diary No. 22120 of 2017 which was also dismissed as withdrawn and pass orders within a reasonable time.

¶20

For Petitioner(s): Mr.K.P.P.Raja Raja Chozhan

¶21

For Respondent(s): Mr.T.M.Rajangam Government Advocate

¶22

ORDER

¶23

By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

¶24

2.This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents

¶25

to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 01.06.2023 and 16.03.2024 for upgrading the petitioner as Road Inspector Grade I on completion of 5 years

¶26

Page2 of 6

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

WP No. 1768 of 2026

¶29

of Service in the light of the order passed by this Hon’ble High Court in WP (MD) No. 7738 to 7749 of 2008 dated 12.12.2012 which was upheld by the Bench of this Honble court in WA (MD) No. 262 to 273 of 2016 and the SLP filed by the respondents in Diary No. 22120 of 2017 which was also dismissed as withdrawn and pass orders within a reasonable time.

¶30

3.The case of the petitioner is that she joined service as a Road Inspector Grade-II on 27.02.1965 and retired in 2003, as a Road Inspector Grade-I, after completing long and continuous government service. Originally, as per G.O Ms.No.1858 dated 22.10.1969, a minimum of 10 years’ service in Grade-II was initially required for movement to Grade-I. Subsequently, this requirement was reduced to 5 years by G.O.Ms.No.856 dated 01.06.1977. Since the duties and responsibilities of Grade-II and Grade-I are identical, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in BSNL v. R.Shanthakumari Velusamy held that such movement is only an upgradation and not a promotion. Further, the Madurai Bench of this Hon’ble Court, in W.P (MD) No. 7738 to 7749 of 2008, directed the implementation of 5 year rule. The State’s appeal in W.A Nos.262 to 273 of 2016 was dismissed, and the SLP filed by the respondents in Diary No. 22120 of 2017 was also dismissed as withdrawn. Subsequent judgments, including W.A No.391 of 2017 and W.A(MD) No.424 of 2023, have reaffirmed this entitlement and granted liberty to individual employees to seek corresponding monetary benefits. Although the petitioner’s non-provincialised service has

¶31

Page3 of 6

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

WP No. 1768 of 2026

¶34

already been counted for increments and pension under G.O.Ms.No.893 dated 22.08.1994, the respondents have refused to consider the same for up-gradation to Selection Grade and Special Grade, resulting in arbitrary and discriminatory denial of benefits. The petitioner made detailed representations on 01.06.2023 and 16.03.2024, but, the same has not been considered till date. Hence the present writ petition has been filed.

¶35

4 .The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 01.06.2023 and 16.03.2024, within a reasonable time to be fixed by this Court.

¶36

5 .Considering the limited request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court, directs the 3 rd respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 01.06.2023 and 16.03.2024, and to pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶37

__________ Page4 of 6

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

WP No. 1768 of 2026

¶40

6. With the above directions, this writ petition stands disposed of. No

¶41

costs.

¶42

29-01-2026