Dismissed¶22

V.Chitra v. Commissioner

Madras HC15 Apr 2026WP/15388/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of Article 226 mandamus petition; property tax assessment card; Corporation of Chennai; Flat No.3, II Floor, Sathyavani Maligai, 83, 3rd Street, A Block, Anna Nagar; built-up area 1500 sq.ft; covered car park 350 sq.ft; undivided share 844 sq.ft; respondents Chandrasekar Builders Pvt Ltd, Thirumathy Chithramugi, Mayura S Bedre; counsel R.Subramanian, P.T.Ramadevi, K.Balajee, D.Kumar; dismissed as withdrawn without costs; endorsement in case bundle; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs. ¶22

V.Chitra Vs Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 15388 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 15388 of 2021

¶6

V.Chitra W/o.Dr.S.Vasantha Kumar, 83 II Floor, Sathyavani Maligai, III street, A Block Anna Nagar, Chennai- 600 102.

¶7

Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

Commissioner Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai- 600 003.

¶10

2.M/s. Chandrasekar Builders PVt Ltd Rep by its Chairman, No.1, Gopalan Street, West mambalam, Chennai- 600 033.

¶11

3.Thirumathy Chithramugi 83, I Floor, Sathyavani Maligai, 3rd street, A Block, Anna Nagar, Chennai- 6000 102.

¶12

4.Mayura S Bedre 3/1, Arcot Road, Vadapalani, Chennai- 600 026.

¶13

Respondent(s)

¶14

PRAYER

¶15

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to issue property Tax assessment card to the petitioner for Flat No.3, II Floor, Sathyavani Maligai, No.83, 3rd Street, A Block, Annanagar, measuring builtup area of 1500 Sq.Ft

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

WP No. 15388 of 2021

¶18

with covered car Park extent of 350 sq.Ft and undivided share of 844 Sq.Ft and receive property tax payable by the petitioner.

¶19

For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Subramanian For Respondent(s): Ms.P.T.Ramadevi, for R1 Mr.K.Balajee for R2 & 4 Mr.D.Kumar, for R3

¶20

ORDER

¶21

When this matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition and in this regard, he has also made an endorsement in the case bundle.

¶22