Disposed

R.Murugan v. The Regional Transport officer

Madras HC10 Apr 2026WP/13389/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought an auto rickshaw permit to operate within 30 km of Mettur Bus Stand; his Form CCPA application was pending. The court directed the Regional Transport Officer, Mettur, to pass final orders on the application on merits within 12 weeks, without expressing any opinion on merits, and disposed the writ petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to consider and dispose of petitioner's 25.02.2026 permit application on merits within 12 weeks; no costs.

R.Murugan Vs The Regional Transport officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

W.P.No.13389 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 10.04.2026

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

W.P.No.13389 of 2026

R.Annadurai

.. Petitioner

Versus

The Regional Transport Officer, Mettur, Salem District. .. Respondent

¶11

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to receive the application of the petitioner, dated 25.02.2026 in Form CCPA along with the prescribed fee through online for the grant of Auto Rickshaw Permit to operate the vehicle within radius of 30 K.M. distance from Mettur Bus stand, Mettur, Salem District and to consider the same.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ganesan For Respondent : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar, Government Advocate

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.13389 of 2026

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This Writ Petition is filed seeking for a direction to the

¶18

respondent to grant Auto Rickshaw permit to the petitioner to operate the vehicle within the radius of 30 kms distance from Mettur Bus Stand,

¶19

Mettur, Salem district, based on the petitioner’s application, dated 25.02.2026, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶20

2. The petitioner seek Auto Rickshaw permit. The petitioner had submitted an application on 25.02.2026 in Form CCPA for the said purpose with the respondent. Since the said application has not been considered, the petitioner has filed this Writ Petition.

¶21

3. Mr.N.Naveen Kumar, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶22

4. No prejudice will be caused to the respondent if the petitioner’s application, dated 25.02.2026, as stated supra, is considered on merits and in accordance with law, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.13389 of 2026

¶26

5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶27

petitioner’s application.

¶28

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the respondent to

¶29

pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s application, dated 25.02.2026 seeking grant of Auto Rickshaw permit in his favour to operate the vehicle within the radius of 30 kms from Mettur Bus Stand, Mettur, Salem district, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

7. This Writ Petition is disposed with the above directions. No

¶31

costs.

¶32

10.04.2026

¶33

Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : yes/no grs/sp

¶34

¶35

The Regional Transport Officer, Mettur, Salem District.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.No.13389 of 2026

¶39

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

grs/sp

W.P.No.13389 of 2026

10.04.2026

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Murugan v. The Regional Transport officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Murugan v. The Regional Transport officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.K.Muruganandam Vs The District collector

M.Ayyavu Vs The District collector

M.M.Somasundaram Vs the Tahsildar

R. Murugan Vs The Regional Transport officer

N.Manikandan Vs The Regional Transport officer

Velvizhi Vs the Regional Transport Officer