Dismissed¶16

G Sivaraman v. The Commissioner

Madras HC10 Apr 2026WP/13201/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

G Sivaraman v The Commissioner and The Assistant Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation; WP No. 13201 of 2026 and WMP. No.14474 of 2026; High Court of Judicature at Madras; C. Saravanan, J.; decided 10-04-2026; property tax Final Notice dated 14.10.2025; Property Tax No. 009/001/902919; impugned order superseded by subsequent demand dated 04.03.2026; writ of certiorari; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; writ petition dismissed with liberty to challenge fresh demand; no costs; advocates T.M. Mano (petitioner) and P. Srinivas, Standing Counsel (respondents).

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the Petitioner to work out the remedy against the subsequent demand dated 04.03.2026, if so advised; no costs imposed; connected miscellaneous petition (WMP. No.14474 of 2026) closed. ¶16

G Sivaraman Vs The Commissioner — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

WP No. 13201 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-04-2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN WP No. 13201 of 2026 and WMP. No.14474 of 2026

¶5

G Sivaraman

¶6

No.92/34, J N Road, Anakkaputhur, Chennai-70.

¶7

..Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.

¶10

The Assistant Commissioner, Tambaram City Municipal Corporation, West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.

¶11

..Respondent(s)

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for records pertaining to Final Notice dated 14.10.2025 with respect to Property Tax No. 009/ 001/ 902919 on the file of 2nd respondent and to quash the same as wholly illegal and arbitrary and for consequential orders.

¶13

For Petitioner(s): Mr.	T.M. Mano
For Respondent(s): Mr.	P. Srinivas,	Standing Counsel

¶14

ORDER

¶15

Today, when the case came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Impugned Order has been superseded by a subsequent demand dated 04.03.2026. A copy of the said demand has also been produced before this Court and the same is taken on record.

¶16

In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed, with liberty to the Petitioner to workout the remedy against the subsequent demand, if so advised. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

¶17

10-04-2026

¶18

Neutral Citation: Yes/No klt

¶19

Page1 of 2

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

WP No. 13201 of 2026

¶22

C.SARAVANAN, J.