Writ petitions filed for reinstatement were dismissed automatically due to the petitioners' failure to comply with registry directions regarding the payment of Batta within the granted time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No. 10546 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15-06-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR
WP No. 10546 of 2010 AND WP NO. 10547 OF 2010 and M.P.No.2 of 2010 and M.P.No.2 of 2010
WP No. 10546 of 2010: C.Kalidoss
..Petitioner
Vs
The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District
..Respondent
WP No. 10547 of 2010:
D.Sampath,
..Petitioner
Vs
The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District
..Respondent
Prayer in WP No. 10546 of 2010: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceedings No.A-2.1333/2009, dated 19.3.2010 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all back wages and attendant benefits.
Prayer in WP No. 10547 of 2010: Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his
Page1 of 4
WP No. 10546 of 2010
proceedings No.A-2.2175/2009, dated 19.3.2010 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all back wages and attendant benefits.
| For Petitioner in both | M/s.c.prakasam |
|---|---|
| W.Ps: | |
| For Respondent in both | |
| W.Ps: | Mrs.Y.Kavitha |
| Government Counsel |
COMMON ORDER
This Court vide order dated 20.11.2024 directed the petitioner to comply with the requirements of the Registry, including payment of Batta by 20.12.2014 and file proof of compliance by 02.01.2025. However, the Registry note dated 22.01.2025 clearly indicates that the petitioner has not complied the office objection.
Page2 of 4
WP No. 10546 of 2010
Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
this Court.
15-06-2026
Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No
MSV
To The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District
__________ Page3 of 4
WP No. 10546 of 2010
T.VINOD KUMAR J.
MSV
WP No. 10546 of 2010 AND WP NO. 10547 OF 2010 and M.P.No.2 of 2010 and M.P.No.2 of 2010
15-06-2026
__________ Page4 of 4
C.Kalidoss
The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District
D.Sampath
The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai, Thiruvannamalai District
T. VINOD KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
