S.Karthikeyan v. The Udumalpet Recreation Club
Case brief
What is this about?
Impleading petition allowed; impleadment of proposed respondents 2 to 5 in writ petition; Article 226 of the Constitution of India; Madras High Court; W.M.P.No.2531 of 2019 in W.P.No.13162 of 2017; Udumalpet Recreation Club; Estate Officer cum Municipal Commissioner, Udumalpet Municipality; Registry directed to amend main writ petition; division bench order dated 10.03.2026.
What did the court decide?
Impleadment of petitioners 1 to 4 as respondents 2 to 5 in W.P.No.13162 of 2017, with the Registry directed to carry out necessary amendment in the main writ petition. ¶21