Disposed¶26

The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd, v. General Secretary

Madras HC23 Feb 2026WA/209/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mention entry in a writ appeal before the High Court of Judicature at Madras: Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd (appellant) v General Secretary, Tamil Nadu Arasu Pokkuvarathu Seerudai Paniyalar Sangam (respondent); consensual grant of three months to implement the Labour Court award in I.D.No.26 of 2018 dated 13.01.2020, connected with the order in W.P. No. 26616 of 2022 dated 12-11-2025 confirmed in the writ appeal; advocates T. Chandrasekaran (appellant) and Nandhini H. for R. Krishnaswamy (respondent).

What did the court decide?

By consent, three months' time granted to implement the award passed by the Labour Court in I.D.No.26 of 2018 dated 13.01.2020. ¶26

The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd, Vs General Secretary — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

WA No. 209 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 17-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

¶8

WA No. 209 of 2026 and CMP NO. 1918 OF 2026

¶9

The Management of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd, No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore-641 043

¶10

..Appellant(s)

¶11

¶12

General Secretary Tamil Nadu Arasu Pokkuvarathu Seerudai Paniyalar Sangam, Reg. No. 1440, No. 610/200, Periya Naicken Palayam, SRKV Post, Coimbatore-20.

¶13

..Respondent(s)

¶14

WA No. 209 of 2026

¶15

To set aside the Order passed by this Honble Court made in W.P. No. 26616 of 2022 dated 12-11-2025 and allow this Writ Appeal and thus render justice.

¶16

WA No. 209 of 2026

¶17

For Appellant(s): Mr.T.Chandrasekaran For Respondent(s): Ms.Nandhini.H. for Mr.R.Krishnaswamy

¶18

Page1 of 3

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

WA No. 209 of 2026

¶21

Judgment

¶22

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.Subramaniam J.)

¶23

Today, the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For being mentioned”.

¶24

Learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the Management of the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited required three months time to implement the order passed in the writ petition as confirmed in the writ appeal.

¶25

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Sangam has no objection for grant three months time to implement the order passed in the writ petition.

¶26

In view of the consent made between the parties, three months time is granted to implement the award passed by the Labour Court in I.D.No.26 of 2018 dated 13.01.2020.

¶27

(S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 17-04-2026

¶28

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶29

VSI

¶30

__________ Page2 of 3

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

WA No. 209 of 2026