Sunit Kumar Agarwal Vs The Asst.General Manager

Sunit Kumar Agarwal Advocate, Flat No.2610, 26^th Floor, Tower B, Lodha White City, Near to Apex Hospital, Akurli Road, Damu Nagar, Lokhandwala, Kandivali East, Mumbai – 400 101.

¶10

.. Appellant

¶11

Vs

¶12

1 The Asst. General Manager (For Kind attention Meera, AGM)

¶13

Punjab National Bank Central Sashtra Circle 2^nd Floor, Spencer Plaza, 769, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002.

¶14

2 K.Mahadevan

¶15

Asstt. General Manager, Punjab National Bank,

¶16

Zonal Sastra, 4^th Floor, PNB Tower, 46-49,

¶17

Royapettah High road Royapettah, Chennai-600 014. (Formerly posted as AGM at Punjab National Bank,

¶18

Central Sastra Circle, 2^nd Floor, Spencer Plaza, 769,

¶19

Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002 (TN)).

¶20

3 The Chief Manager

¶21

(For Kind Attention Narmadha)

¶22

Punjab National Bank, 150, Luz Church Road

¶23

Mylapore, Chennai – 600 004.

¶24

Page 1 of 9

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

W.A.No.1750 of 2024

¶27

4 The Chief Manager

¶28

(For Kind Attention D.Muthukumar)

¶29

Punjab National Bank, No.21-Raja Annamalai Road Puruswalkam, Chennai – 600 084.

¶30

5 Rahul Srivastava Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank

¶31

Retail Assets Branch (Loan Point), 3^rd Floor , Royala Towers, 158, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 002. (Formerly Posted as CM at Punjab National Bank

¶32

No.21-Raja Annamalai Road, Puruswalkam,

¶33

Chennai – 600 084. (TN)).

¶34

6 Amit Kumar Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank

¶35

Head Customer Acquisition Centre (CAC)

¶36

Trichy Main Branch, Behind Bus Stand,

¶37

Tiruchirappalli Trichy-621 111.

¶38

(Formerly Posted as CM at Punjab National Bank

¶39

No.21-Raja Annamalai Road, Puruswalkam,

¶40

Chennai – 600 084. (TN)).

¶41

7 Shiva Komra Manager – Law, Punjab National Bank

¶42

Sastra Centre, 1^st Floor, 27-33-40

¶43

Kodavalli Vari Street, Besant Road Cross Governorpet, Vijayawada-520 002

¶44

(Formerly posted as Mgr-Law at ARMB,

¶45

Mezzanine Floor, PNB Tower, 46-49,

¶46

Royapettah High Road, Royapettah

¶47

Chennai – 600 014 (TN)).

¶48

8 Praseetha Pillai @ Prabhakaran Chief Manager – Law, Punjab National Bank

¶49

Zonal Office, Camp Office 6-1-73, 2^nd Floor Saeed Plaza, Ladki-Ka-Pul Saifabad

¶50

Khairtabad. Hyderabad – 500 004 (Telangana)

¶51

(Formerly posted as Sr MGR-Law at Circle Office,

¶52

2^nd Floor, PNB Tower, 46-49, Royapettah High Road,

¶53

Royapettah, Chennai – 600 014 (TN)).

¶54

_______________ Page 2 of 9_

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

W.A.No.1750 of 2024

¶57

9 The Circle Head

¶58

Punjab National Bank Circle Office PNB Tower, 2^nd Floor, 46-49 Royapettah High Road Royapettah Chennai – 600 014.

¶59

10 The Zonal Manager Punjab National Bank, Zonal Office, PNB Tower, 5^th Floor, 46-49 Royapettah High Road, Royapettah Chennai – 600 014.

¶60

.. Respondents

¶61

PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 18.4.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.1379 of 2024.

¶62

For Appellant : Mr.Sunit Kumar Agarwal Appearing in person For Respondents : Mr.P.Raghunath for M/s.T.S.Gopalan & Co

¶63

JUDGMENT

¶64

(Delivered by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)

¶65

This writ appeal is directed against the order dated 18.4.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.1379 of 2024. By the said order, the learned Single Judge declined to exercise extraordinary writ jurisdiction to resolve a dispute involving unpaid professional legal fees and dismissed the writ petition. Aggrieved by

¶66

_______________ Page 3 of 9_

¶67

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶68

appeal.

¶69

W.A.No.1750 of 2024

¶70

this dismissal, the appellant, appearing in person, has preferred this appeal.

¶71

The appellant is a former empanelled advocate for Punjab National Bank (the respondent bank). He approached the writ court seeking a direction to the respondents for the payment of outstanding bills toward professional fees and expenses, quantified initially at Rs.6,80,412/-, and subsequently enhanced in these appellate proceedings to Rs.10,00,628/- on account of newly discovered bills.

¶72

The appellant, appearing in person, submits that the outstanding dues are undisputed and he has rendered services to the absolute satisfaction of the bank over several years. The delay and non-payment are owing to administrative malice, as certain bank officials demanded 40% commission to release his legitimate dues. The respondent bank, as an instrumentality of the State under Article 12 of the Constitution, cannot act arbitrarily or in breach of trust.

¶73

_______________ Page 4 of 9_

¶74

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶75

W.A.No.1750 of 2024

¶76

Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent bank submits that while certain undisputed bills have already been settled, other claims are seriously disputed. He added that certain deficiencies in service have necessitated a closer scrutiny of the bills, rendering the entire claim a private contractual dispute.

¶77

We have given our anxious consideration to the submissions advanced on either side.

¶78

The core issue that stems up for consideration is whether a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is the appropriate remedy for enforcing a claim for professional fees arising out of an attorney-client relationship, especially where the facts are seriously disputed.

¶79

A writ is an extraordinary public law remedy. It is designed to correct glaring constitutional overreaches, failures of public duty, and arbitrary abuses of State power. It is not intended to serve as an alternate recovery mechanism for commercial or professional contracts.

¶80

_______________ Page 5 of 9_

¶81

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶82

W.A.No.1750 of 2024

¶83

For a court to step into the realm of contract under writ jurisdiction, the appellant must demonstrate an absolute, unambiguous admission of liability by the respondent, coupled with shocking arbitrariness that offends the sense of justice under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. When the respondent/bank raises questions regarding the performance of a service, the matter loses its public law character and enters the domain of private civil obligations.

¶84

A scrutiny of the records reveals that the claims submitted by the appellant are not admitted by the bank. The bank has explicitly cited deficiencies in the legal services rendered. The appellant, on his part, has countered with grave criminal allegations of bribery and corruption.

¶85

On an overall consideration of the facts, the learned Single Judge, in our view, was right in holding that a writ petition is not the appropriate remedy to resolve this disputed contractual matter.

¶86

_______________ Page 6 of 9_

¶87

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶88

W.A.No.1750 of 2024

¶89

We find no legal infirmity in the approach adopted by the learned Single Judge that warrants our intervention in appeal.

¶90

The dismissal of the writ petition does not mean the appellant is without a remedy. The appellant has knocked on the wrong judicial door. The proper course of action is to approach a competent civil court, where both parties can file detailed pleadings, produce documents, cross-examine witnesses and establish the truth through a regular trial.

¶91

The appeal is hereby dismissed and the impugned order of the learned Single Judge is affirmed.

¶92

The appellant is granted liberty to establish his claims for professional fees and agitate his grievances before a competent civil court or appropriate forum. If the appellant chooses to file a civil suit, the time spent bona fide prosecuting the writ petition and this writ appeal shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation.

¶93

_______________ Page 7 of 9_

¶94

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶95

W.A.No.1750 of 2024

¶96

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶97

(SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI,CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 14.07.2026

¶98

Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sasi