Dismissed¶24

G.Gayathri v. J.Sri Vigneshwaran

Madras HC1 Jun 2026TR CMP(MD)/646/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.646 of 2025, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, K. Murali Shankar J., decided 01.06.2026. Wife's transfer petition under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code sought transfer of H.M.O.P.No.155 of 2025 from the Family Court, Srivilliputhur (Virudhunagar District) to the Sub Court, Paramathi Velur. The Family Court reported that the H.M.O.P. was dismissed as not pressed (letter dated 16.05.2026); both counsel conceded, and the transfer petition was dismissed as infructuous with the connected C.M.P.(MD)No.18789 of 2025 closed and no costs.

What did the court decide?

Since H.M.O.P.No.155 of 2025 was ordered to be dismissed as not pressed before the Family Court, Srivilliputtur, and counsel on either side conceded the same, the present transfer petition has become infructuous. ¶22

G.Gayathri Vs J.Sri Vigneshwaran — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Tr.CMP(MD)No.646 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 01.06.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.646 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.18789 of 2025

G.Gayathri

... Petitioner/

Respondent-wife

Vs.

J.Sri Vigneshwaran ... Respondent/ Petitioner-Husband

¶12

Prayer : This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the case on the file of the learned Family Court, Sriviliputhur, Virudhunagar District in H.M.O.P.No.155 of 2025 and transfer the same to the learned Sub Court at Paramathi Velur.

¶13

For Petitioner : M.Chandra Sekar

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.M.Iniyavan

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Tr.CMP(MD)No.646 of 2025

¶20

case in H.M.O.P.No.155 of 2025 on the file of the Family Court, Srivilliputhur, Virudhunagar District and transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court, Paramathi Velur.

¶21

In pursuance of the direction of this Court, the learned Judge of

¶22

Family Court, Srivilliputtur, holding full additional charge submitted a letter dated 16.05.2026 stating that the papers were earlier returned only due to the technical glitch in viewing the petition filed through online and that subsequently, on 16.05.2026, memo filed as not press H.M.O.P.No. 155 of 2025 and on that basis, HMOP was ordered to be dismissed as not pressed. The learned counsel on either side would also concede the same and as such, the present transfer petition has become infructuous.

¶23