Dismissed¶26

Priyarakshitha v. Gurusamy

Madras HC3 Mar 2026TR CMP(MD)/368/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: transfer petition; Section 24 Civil Procedure Code; Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.368 of 2025; C.M.P.(MD)No.10065 of 2025; H.M.O.P.No.144 of 2025; Family Court Tirunelveli; Sub Court Kulithalai; divorce granted 18.11.2025; dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs; no appearance for petitioner; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice K. Murali Shankar; petitioner Priyarakshitha; respondents Gurusamy and Srihari; counsel Mr.R.Muthuram for R1; order dated 03.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

Recording that the Family Court, Tirunelveli had, after full trial, allowed H.M.O.P.No.144 of 2025 and granted divorce by order dated 18.11.2025, thereby rendering the transfer petition infructuous, the Court dismissed the Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition as infructuous. ¶26

Priyarakshitha Vs Gurusamy — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Tr.CMP(MD)No.368 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 03.03.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.368 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.10065 of 2025

¶7

Priyarakshitha ... Petitioner/

¶8

Respondent No.1

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.Gurusamy ... 1^st Respondent/ Petitioner

¶11

2.Srihari ... 2^nd Respondent/ Respondent No.2

¶12

Prayer : This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw the case in H.M.O.P.No.144 of 2025 on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli and transfer the same to the file of the Sub Court, Kulithalai for other reliefs.

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

For Petitioner : No appearance

¶16

Tr.CMP(MD)No.368 of 2025

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.R.Muthuram for R1

¶18

ORDER

¶19

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed to withdraw the case on the file of the Family Court, Tirunelveli, in H.M.O.P.No.144 of 2025 and transfer the same to the Sub Court, Kulithalai.

¶20

When the matter is taken up today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

¶21

The learned counsel appearing for the first respondent would submit that the Family Court, Tirunelveli, after full trial in H.M.O.P.No. 144 of 2025, allowed the petition vide order dated 18.11.2025 and granted divorce and that therefore, the present petition has become infructuous and he has also produced the copy of the order passed by the Family Court, Tirunelveli.

¶22