Dismissed¶18

Helen Sathya v. Maria Selvam

Madras HC12 Mar 2026TR CMP(MD)/198/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.198 of 2025; transfer petition under Section 24 CPC; D.V.C.No.9 of 2023; Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Kovilpatti to Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila) Court, Madurai; dismissed as infructuous; settlement between parties; underlying case already closed; connected C.M.P.(MD)No.5050 of 2025 closed; no costs; K. Murali Shankar, J.; dated 12.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition was dismissed as infructuous, the Court recording that the parties had settled and that D.V.C.No.9 of 2023 had already been closed by the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Kovilpatti, leaving nothing to be decided in the petition; the connected miscellaneous petition was closed, with no costs. ¶18

Helen Sathya Vs Maria Selvam — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Tr.CMP(MD)No.198 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 12.03.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

Tr.C.M.P.(MD)No.198 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.5050 of 2025

¶7

Helan Sathya ... Petitioner/ Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.Maria Selvam 2.Philominal 3.Ennasi Ammal 4.Maria Stella ... Respondents/ Respondents

¶10

Prayer : This Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 24 of Civil Procedure Code, to withdraw and transfer the above D.V.C.No.9 of 2023 from the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Kovilpatti to the learned Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila) Court, Madurai and dispose the same in accordance with law.

¶11

1/4

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

Tr.CMP(MD)No.198 of 2025

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Gangai Amaran For Respondents : Mr.S.Ramasamy for R1 to R3 No appearance for R4

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking orders to withdraw the case on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.2, Kovilpatti, in D.V.C.No.9 of 2023 and transfer the same to the file of the Judicial Magistrate (Additional Mahila) Court, Madurai.

¶17

When the matter is taken up today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that the matter was settled between the parties and on that basis, the case in D.V.C.No.9 of 2023 was already closed by the Judicial Magistrate No.2, Kovilpatti and that nothing remains to be decided in the present petition.

¶18