Dismissed¶77

Tvl Tamil Nadu Air Products P v. State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC29 Jun 2026TC/52/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Industrial gas cylinders; miscellaneous charges taxable as part of sale turnover; maintenance charges; empty collection charges; service charges; cooling and evaporation charges; testing, painting and second rentals; second sales; spindles; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 — Section 2(n), Section 2(r), Explanation (2) to Clause (r) of Section 2; Form XVII composite value; Gas Cylinder Rules, 1981; over-retention of cylinders; State of Orissa v. Asiatic Gases Ltd. (MANU/SC/7709/2007); Tribunal order in S.T.A.Nos.675-678 of 2006 upheld; Tax Cases dismissed; High Court of Judicature at Madras.

What did the court decide?

None; the Tax Cases are dismissed with no costs and the connected M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 are closed. ¶77

Tvl Tamil Nadu Air Products P Vs State of Tamil Nadu — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

None; the Tax Cases are dismissed with no costs and the connected M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 are closed.

¶77

Issue for consideration

Whether miscellaneous charges collected on transactions involving long-life, re-usable gas cylinders (maintenance, servicing, loading and unloading, empty collection, delay-in-return and evaporation charges), being amounts unrelated to transfer of property in goods, are exigible to sales tax with reference to the definitions of 'sale' in Section 2(n) and 'turnover' in Section 2(r) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, particularly where the Tribunal made no finding of fact on the nature and exigibility of these specific non-sale activities. +2 more

¶60

Court's answer

The petitioner's contention that the miscellaneous expenses should be segregated from the sale turnover is not sustainable, because the total sale turnover, the invoice and Form XVII reflect the composite value of the gas and the charges; hence the charges collected cannot be considered a non-sale transaction.

¶68

Ratio / Principle

There is no material difference between collection of rent for extra-retention of cylinders (the subject-matter of the Supreme Court's holding in State of Orissa v. Asiatic Gases Ltd.) and the charges for maintenance, cooling and evaporation, painting etc.: all form part of the transaction of sale of gas in a cylinder, the miscellaneous charges being connected with maintenance of the cylinder and with safety of transport and stocking of the gas.

¶75

Key takeaways

The impugned common order of the Tribunal is upheld and the Tax Cases are dismissed with no costs; the connected M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 are closed.ratio¶76

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Madras High Court (order by Dr. G. Jayachandran J., bench including Mrs. Justice N. Mala), TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013, decided 29-06-2026: A supplier of industrial gas challenged the common order of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Chennai, in S.T.A.Nos.675-678 of 2006 (assessment years 1999-2000 to 2002-03), whereby the Tribunal reversed the Appellate Authority's deletions and confirmed tax on miscellaneous charges — maintenance, empty collection, service, cooling and evaporation, testing, painting and second rentals, and second sales — as part of the sale turnover under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. On the substantial questions framed under Section 2(n) and 2(r), the Court held that the total sale turnover, invoice and Form XVII reflected the composite value of the gas and the charges, so the charges could not be treated as a non-sale transaction; that the charges formed part of the transaction of sale of gas in cylinders, being connected with cylinder maintenance and safety of transport and stocking; and that there was no material difference between such charges and the rent for over-retention of cylinders which the Supreme Court in State of Orissa v. Asiatic Gases Ltd. (MANU/SC/7709/2007) held fell within the definition of sale. The impugned Tribunal order was upheld and the Tax Cases dismissed with no costs, connected M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 closed.

¶1

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 29-06-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N. MALA

¶8

TC Nos. 52 TO 55 of 2013

¶9

Tvl.Tamil Nadu Air Products (P) Limited.

¶10

..Petitioner(s) in all Cases

¶11

¶12

State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Deputy Commissioner[CT] Chennai (Central) Division, Chennai - 600 006.

¶13

..Respondent(s) in all Cases

¶14

Petitions against the orders of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Chennai, passed in S.T.A.Nos.675, 676, 677 and 678 of 2006.

¶15

For Petitioner(s) in all Mr.T.V.Lakshmanan Cases : For Respondent(s) in all Mr.R.Sethu Prabhakaran, Cases : Govt. Advocate.

¶16

__________ Page1 of 10

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶19

ORDER

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.Jayachandran J.)

¶21

The common order of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Chennai, passed in S.T.A.Nos.675 to 678 of 2006, is under challenge before this Court.

¶22

These cases cover four Assessment Years, commencing from 1999-

¶23

2000 to 2002-2003.

¶24

The point involved in these cases is, whether the Miscellaneous Charges collected by the assessee from its customers towards specific and separate activities can be compendiously treated as sale of goods for levy of tax ?

¶25

The petitioner, involved in supply of industrial gas, has collected maintenance charges, empty collection charges, service charges, cooling and evaporation charges, testing, painting and second rentals, and second sales, for which the Department levied tax. The proposal of the Department was objected to by the trader, stating that the Gas Cylinder Rules,1981, cover the refilling of Oxygen and other permanent gases under high pressure in gas cylinders. Under the Rules, before refilling, the cylinder had to be tested to remove dust and other unwanted materials. Therefore, to ensure security and safety, certain measures were to be taken by the suppliers, for which miscellaneous charges were collected and the same could not be taken as part of the sale price. However, the

¶26

Page2 of 10

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶29

objection was overruled by the Assessing Officer, holding that the miscellaneous receipts by the trader were in connection with sale of gas only and, therefore, charges collected towards specific and separate activities from the customers were liable to be taxed.

¶30

As per explanation (2) to Clause (r) of Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, the amount for which goods are sold shall include any sums charged for anything done by the dealer in respect of the goods sold at the time of or before the delivery thereof.

¶31

The order of the Assessing Officer was taken up on appeal before the Assistant Commissioner (CT). The Appellate Authority allowed the appeals in favour of the dealers with the following observations :

¶32

(1) As regards estimated sales turnover under form XVII, the buyers issued form XVII covering all the expenses, but the dealer collected tax at 3% on the value of gas sold. As the value in form XVII is more than the turnover reported by the dealer, the Assessing Officer taxed the same at 3%, but, at the same time, various charges were also subjected to tax at 16%. Therefore, the assessment at 3% on the difference in turnover of Rs.17,35,436/- amounts to double taxation and hence it cannot be sustained.

¶33

(2) The cylinder maintenance charges, cylinder testing charges, are not related to processes done to the gas before sale, therefore, these charges are not pre-sale charges and cannot form part of the taxable turnover. The empty collection charges are collected for cylinders only which is packing materials. Such charges are collected independent of sale of gas and this is not the charge

¶34

Page3 of 10

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶37

collected for something done to the goods i.e., gas sold. As per Rule 6 (c) (iii), if shown separately, the delivery charges are liable to be deducted from taxable turnover. In the cooling and evaporation charges, no sale is involved as there is no transfer of property is involved. Regarding rate of tax on sale of cylinders, as per entry 19A of Part ‘C’ of first schedule, empty gas cylinders are taxable at 8%. The spindles are taxable at 11% as there is no specific entry for it. With respect to penalty levied under section 12 (3) (b) for the year 2002-03 as the entire disputed assessments were set aside and decided in favour of the dealer, the question of levy of penalty does not arise, as a result the penalty levied is set aside and deleted. With the above findings, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT) has decided the entire disputes in favour of the dealer.”

¶38

As against the order of the appellate authority, the Department went on

¶39

appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal, after considering the facts, observed that under Form XVII , the buyers were charged for miscellaneous expenses under various heads along with cost of the goods. The tax at the rate of 16% levied by the Assessing Officer was also taken into consideration. It was also observed by the Tribunal that the sale was reflected in Form XVII and not in Form XVIII-A and, that, in any event, the difference would be around Rs.6,01,850/-. The difference being explained by the Assessing Officer, the Tribunal confirmed the order of the Assessment Officer, by reversing the finding of the appellate authority. As far as other miscellaneous charges are concerned, with regard to levy of tax in respect of sale of spindles, the order of

¶40

Page4 of 10

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶43

the appellate authority, classifying it under the residuary entry, was confirmed.

¶44

In the result, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeal filed by the Government as below :

¶45

“In the affirmative, the orders of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (CT) are,

¶46

(1) Set aside with respect to miscellaneous charges collected (1999-2000 to 2002-03)

¶47

(2) Confirmed with respect to estimated sales against form XVII (1999-2000)

¶48

(3) Partly confirmed (2000-01 & 2001-02) & partly remanded (2002-03) with respect to rate of tax dispute on cylinders

¶49

(4) Confirmed with respect to rate of tax dispute on spindles (2001-02)

¶50

(5) Set aside with respect to penalty for the confirmed assessments (2002-03)

¶51

In result, the STA in 677/06 – stands partly allowed, partly dismissed

¶52

STA in 675/06 – stands partly allowed, partly dismissed STA in 676/06 – stands partly allowed, partly dismissed

¶53

STA in 678/06 – stands partly allowed, partly remanded.”

¶54

In respect of the portion of the order held against the assessee, the assessee has

¶55

preferred these Tax Cases.

¶56

At the time of admission, considering the grounds of appeal, this Court framed the following substantial questions of law :

¶57

Page5 of 10

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶60

(1) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case especially in case of gas cylinder with long life, being far costlier than gas and being re-usable and in view of Section 2 (n), charges on non-sale transactions like maintenance, servicing, loading and unloading, empty collection, charges for delay in returning and evaporation charges being amounts unrelated to transfer of property in goods, especially when the Tribunal did not make any finding of fact as to the nature and exigibility to sales tax in relation to specific non-sale activities with reference to the definitions of sale in 2(n) and turnover in 2(r) in the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act,1959 ?

¶61

(2) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, especially in case of gas cylinder as a container with long life and being re-usable and any amount relating to a non-sale event relating to the container like gas cylinder and unconnected to the sale of goods like gas, and in view of Section 2(n) and 2(r) and other provisions of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, the Tribunal misapplied the law with a perverse finding of fact in relation to empties collection charges, cooling and evaporation charges, maintenance charges and testing, painting and rental charges which represented either a totally post-sale, post-utilization activity or did not involve passing of properties or statutory obligation or second sales on the sole ground that charges were collected in the invoice ?

¶62

(3) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case and the provisions of law, aspect of second sales is properly considered by the Tribunal ?

¶63

__________ Page6 of 10

¶64

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶65

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶66

The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the gas cylinder used for the purpose of industries is, at times, costlier than the gas, which is filled in it, and the cylinder being re-usable, it should be treated as a non-sale transaction and the charges like maintenance, servicing, loading and unloading, empty collection, charges for delay in returning and evaporation charges will fall outside the definition of sale transaction in view of Section 2 (n) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act,1959, and, therefore, those miscellaneous charges ought to have been exempted from the total turnover of the dealer.

¶67

Conversely, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State, would submit that no doubt the cylinder is re-usable and, for the purpose of reusing, maintenance and servicing are required even as per the statute, but, however, when those charges are mulcted with the price of the gas and sold to the customer, the sale price, to be considered as a whole, includes other miscellaneous charges.

¶68

The contention of the petitioner to segregate the miscellaneous expenses is not sustainable, in view of the fact that the total sale turnover and the invoice as well as Form XVII reflect the composite value and the gas sale price. Hence, the charges collected cannot be considered as a non-sale transaction. In respect of the charges like cooling and evaporation charges, maintenance, testing and painting and second rental charges, identical

¶69

Page7 of 10

¶70

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶71

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶72

arguments were placed by the Department, impressing upon this Court that those activities were in the course of sale and required for the utilisation of the gas cylinder.

¶73

In almost similar factual circumstances, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in State of Orissa and Ors v . Asiatic Gases Ltd. , MANU/SC//7709/2007, held that over-retention of gas cylinders will fall within the definition of sale under Section 2 (h) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act,1947.

¶74

Learned counsel for the petitioners wanted to distinguish the dictum of the above said decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, in so far as collection of other miscellaneous charges, such as, maintenance charges, cooling and evaporation charges, testing, painting and second rentals.

¶75

However, we find not much difference in respect of collection of rent for extra-retention and the charges for maintenance, cooling and evaporation, painting etc., since all form part of the transaction of sale of gas in a cylinder and the miscellaneous charges are in connection with maintenance of cylinder as well as to ensure safety of transport and stocking of the gas.

¶76

In the said circumstances, we uphold the impugned order passed by

¶77

the Tribunal and dismiss the Tax Cases. No costs. Consequently, the connected

¶78

M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 are closed.

¶79

(G.J.,J.) (N.M.,J.) 29-06-2026

¶80

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶81

__________ Page8 of 10

¶82

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶83

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶84

DIXIT

¶85

¶86

Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Chennai.

¶87

State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by The Deputy Commissioner[CT] Chennai (Central) Division, Chennai - 600 006.

¶88

__________ Page9 of 10

¶89

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶90

TC Nos. 52-55 of 2013

¶91

DR.G.JAYACHANDRAN J. AND N.MALA J.

¶92

DIXIT

¶93

TC Nos. 52 TO 55 of 2013

¶94

29-06-2026

¶95

__________ Page10 of 10

¶96

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

3 issues framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether miscellaneous charges collected on transactions involving long-life, re-usable gas cylinders (maintenance, servicing, loading and unloading, empty collection, delay-in-return and evaporation charges), being amounts unrelated to transfer of property in goods, are exigible to sales tax with reference to the definitions of 'sale' in Section 2(n) and 'turnover' in Section 2(r) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, particularly where the Tribunal made no finding of fact on the nature and exigibility of these specific non-sale activities.¶60
The court held
The petitioner's contention that the miscellaneous expenses should be segregated from the sale turnover is not sustainable, because the total sale turnover, the invoice and Form XVII reflect the composite value of the gas and the charges; hence the charges collected cannot be considered a non-sale transaction.ratio¶68
2.
Whether the Tribunal misapplied the law with a perverse finding of fact in relation to empties collection charges, cooling and evaporation charges, maintenance charges and testing, painting and rental charges — which represented either totally post-sale, post-utilization activity or did not involve passing of property, statutory obligation or second sales — on the sole ground that the charges were collected in the invoice.¶61
The court held
There is no material difference between collection of rent for extra-retention of cylinders (the subject-matter of the Supreme Court's holding in State of Orissa v. Asiatic Gases Ltd.) and the charges for maintenance, cooling and evaporation, painting etc.: all form part of the transaction of sale of gas in a cylinder, the miscellaneous charges being connected with maintenance of the cylinder and with safety of transport and stocking of the gas.ratio¶75
3.
Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case and the provisions of law, the aspect of second sales was properly considered by the Tribunal.¶62

Tvl Tamil Nadu Air Products P v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tvl Tamil Nadu Air Products P v. State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. M.S.S. Transport, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Mrs.G.Mahalakshmi, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

M.Sankar Vs the Commissioner

S.Paramaguru Vs The National Consumer Disputes Redressal commission

Padhmanaban Vs the Secretary to Government

P.Elumalai Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to the government