J.Babu and 19 others Vs Thiru.Shilpa prabhakar sathis IAS and 2 others

J.Babu, S/o Jayaraman, DSTO O/o Joint Commissioner (ST) Intelligence, Coimbatore, Presently working as DSTO O/o Deputy commissioner (ST) Zone I Coimbatore.

¶10

G. Maheshwaran, S/o S.Ganesan, DSTO O/o Dy. Commissioner (ST) Inspector, Coimbatore.

¶11

C.Rajasekar, S/o M.Chinnadorai, DSTO O/o Joint Commissioner (ST) Intelligence, Coimbatore.

¶12

M. Kanagaeswari, W/o K. Balasubramaniam, DSTO/ O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Singanallur North, Coimbatore – 18.

¶13

S.T.Ambika, W/o K.Nagarjan,

¶14

DSTO O/o Dy. Commissioner (ST) Inspection, Coimbatore.

¶15

K. Malarvizhi, W/o A.Rajeswaran

¶16

DSTO/ O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Perur Circle, Coimbatore – 18.

¶17

1/6

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Sub Application No.591 of 2026 in Contempt Petition No.2745 of 2022

¶20

J.Sagaya Mary Vijaya, D/o A.John DSTO O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Annur Circle, Coimbatore.

¶21

E.P. Selvi, W/o M. Rajendran, Assistant (Retd) 31.03.2019 O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Ganapathy Circle, Coimbatore.

¶22

R. Nagendran, S/o R. Ramasamy, DSTO O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Avanasi Circle, Avanasi.

¶23

S. Velusamy,S/o M.Subbaiah, Assistant, O/oDy.Commissioner (ST) (Appeal) Main) Coimbatore.

¶24

P.Selvaraj, S/o A.C. Ponnusamy, Assistant, O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Ramnagar Circle, Coimbatore.

¶25

A. Kalirathinam, S/o Akilandadevar, DSTO (Adjudication) O/o Joint Commissioner (ST) Intelligence, Coimbatore.

¶26

R.Sudhamathi, W/o R.Jeganathan, DSTO O/o Dy. Commissioner (ST) Inspection, Coimbatore.

¶27

V.Ravi, S/o N.Venkatachalapathy,

¶28

Assistant, O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Mettupalayam Taluk Circle, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore.

¶29

K. Thirupathy, S/o Karuppaiyan, DSTO O/o Joint Commissioner (ST) Coimbatore.

¶30

2/6

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

Sub Application No.591 of 2026 in Contempt Petition No.2745 of 2022

¶33

A.Ganesan, S/o Arumugam, Assistant. O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Periyanaickenpalayam Circle, Coimbatore.

¶34

M.Rajasekaran, S/o R.Murugesan, DSTO O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Saravanampatti East Circle, Coimbatore.

¶35

S.Venugopal, S/o S.A.Sivasamy, DSTO O/o Asst. Commissioner (ST) Avarampalayam Circle, Coimbatore.

¶36

V.Abimanyu, S/o U.Veeran, Assistant O/o Dy. Commissioner (ST) Inspection, Coimbatore.

¶37

N.Soodamani, S/o P.Nagappan, Assistant O/o Dy. Commissioner (ST) Inspection, Coimbatore.

¶38

… Petitioners / Petitioners / Petitioners

¶39

-vs-

¶40

Thiru. Shilpa Prabhakar Sathis IAS, Secretary, Finance Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009.

¶41

Thiru.S.Nagarajan, IAS The Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Ezhilaga, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶42

Thirumathi. M.N. Poongodi IAS, The Additional Commissioner (Administrative) Office of the Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Commercial Tax Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.

¶43

... Respondents / Respondents / Respondents

¶44

3/6

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

Sub Application No.591 of 2026 in Contempt Petition No.2745 of 2022

¶47

Prayer: This Sub Application filed under Section 11 of the Contempts of Court Act, 1971, r/w 151 C.P.C to reopen the Contempt Petition No.2745 of 2022 which was closed on 26.02.2025 in W.P.No.22185 of 2021.

¶48

For Petitioner :: Ms.S.Suneetha For Respondents :: Mr.G.Abraham Prabhu Government Advocate

¶49

ORDER

¶50

The petitioners have filed the present Sub Application seeking to reopen Contempt Petition No.2745 of 2022 on the ground that the order of this Court dated 02.11.2021 passed in W.P.No.22185 of 2021 has not yet been complied with by the respondents.

¶51

It is seen that the respondents have been seeking adjournments in

¶52

the contempt proceedings on the ground that the order of this Court, which was affirmed by the Division Bench, is proposed to be challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. It is submitted that the matter is likely to be taken up on 14.07.2026.

¶53

4/6

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

Sub Application No.591 of 2026 in Contempt Petition No.2745 of 2022

¶56

However, as on date, there is no order of stay operating against the

¶57

order of this Court. The respondents are therefore duly bound to comply with the same. Considering the above circumstances, this Sub Application for reopening the contempt petition is allowed.

¶58