Allowed¶35

G. Laxmi Priya, I.a.S., v. G.Dhandapani and 3 others

Madras HC27 Apr 2026SUB APPL/532/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dispensation of personal appearance; Sub Application (OS) Nos. 532 and 533 of 2026 in Contempt Petition No. 1032 of 2025; Madras High Court; order dated 27.04.2026 by Justice Krishnan Ramasamy; applicants G.Laxmi Priya I.A.S. (Secretary, Adi Dravida and Tribal Welfare Department) and Kranthi Kumar Pati I.A.S. (District Collector, Coimbatore); respondents G.Dhandapani, K.D.Saroja, D.Bagya Venkatasubramanian, D.Madanagopal and Mr.Kumar, Special Tahsildar (Land Acquisition, Harijan Welfare); petitions allowed; appearance before Court dispensed with.

What did the court decide?

Personal appearance of the applicants / respondents 1 and 2 before this Court in Contempt Petition No.1032 of 2025 dispensed with. ¶35

G. Laxmi Priya, I.a.S., Vs G.Dhandapani and 3 others — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Sub.Appl.(OS).No.532 & 533 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 27.04.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶6

Sub Application (OS) No.532 & 533 of 2026 in

¶7

Contempt Petition No. 1032 of 2025

¶8

G.Laxmi Priya, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, Adi Dravida and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶9

... Applicant in Sub.Appl.No.532 of 2026

¶10

Mr.Kranthi Kumar Pati, I.A.S., The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore – 641 018. … Applicant in Sub.Appl.No.533 of 2026

V s.

1.G.Dhandapani

2.K.D.Saroja

3.D.Bagya Venkatasubramanian

¶15

4.D.Madanagopal … Respondents 1 to 4 in both petitions

¶16

5.Mr.Kranthi Kumar Pati, I.A.S., The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶17

… 5^th respondent in Sub.Appl.No.532 of 2026

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Sub.Appl.(OS).No.532 & 533 of 2026

¶21

5.G.Laxmi Priya, I.A.S.,

¶22

The Secretary to Government, Adi Dravida and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶23

… 5^th respondent in Sub.Appl.No.533 of 2026

¶24

6.Mr.Kumar,

¶25

The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Harijan Welfare, Collectorate.

¶26

... 6^th Respondent in both petitions

¶27

For Applicant : Mr.J.Ravindran Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.T.K.Saravanan in both petitions For Respondents : Ms.R.Revathy

¶28

COMMON ORDER

¶29

These petitions are filed to dispense with the personal appearance

¶30

of the applicants / respondents 1 and 2 on 27.04.2026 before this Court in Contempt Petition No.1032 of 2025.

¶31

2/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Sub.Appl.(OS).No.532 & 533 of 2026

¶34

Considering the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support

¶35

of the petitions, these petitions are ordered, the personal appearance of the applicants / respondents 1 and 2 before this Court is dispensed with.

27.04.2026

kkn

1.Mr.Kranthi Kumar Pati, I.A.S., The District Collector, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore – 641 018.

¶40

2.G.Laxmi Priya, I.A.S., The Secretary to Government, Adi Dravida and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶41

3.Mr.Kumar, The Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Harijan Welfare, Collectorate.

¶42

3/4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

Sub.Appl.(OS).No.532 & 533 of 2026

¶45

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J.,

¶46

KKN

¶47

Sub Application (OS) No.532 & 533 of 2026 in Contempt Petition No. 1032 of 2025

¶48

27.04.2026

¶49

4/4

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G. Laxmi Priya, I.a.S., v. G.Dhandapani and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G. Laxmi Priya, I.a.S., v. G.Dhandapani and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

D.Manivannan Vs Icici Bank

Shanmugaraj Vs The Block Development officer

N.Shanmugam, Vs the Special Tahsildar

C.S.Murugesan Vs The Assistant Commissioner(General)

Ravikumar Vs The Revenue Divisional officer

Balaji, Vs Mr. a.Anandhan and 2 others