Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

V. Elangovan, Vs v. Amirthamani — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Madras HC
2026
V. Elangovan, Vs v. AmirthamaniV. Elangovan, v. v. Amirthamani

Dismissed¶28

V. Elangovan, v. v. Amirthamani

Madras HC12 Jun 2026SA(MD)/712/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal SA(MD) No.712 of 2022, Madras High Court Madurai Bench, Justice P.B. Balaji, decided 12.06.2026; arose from partition/recovery of possession/permanent injunction suit O.S. No.361 of 2010 (Karur) dismissed at trial and on first appeal (A.S. No.32 of 2012, Principal District Judge, Karur); disposed by dismissal recording joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026; plaintiffs (V. Elangovan, M. Loganathan) received Rs.10,00,000/- (ten lakh rupees) in full and final settlement; compromise memo part of decree; no costs; connected CMP(MD) No.10673 of 2022 closed; advocates K. Govindarajan (appellants) and V. Balaji (respondents).

What did the court decide?

Second appeal dismissed on approval of the joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026; plaintiffs acknowledged receipt of Rs.10,00,000/- in full and final settlement; compromise memo made part of the decree; no order as to costs; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

Why is it important?

Recording the joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026, the second appeal is dismissed, and the compromise memo shall form part of the decree. ¶28

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Second appeal dismissed on approval of the joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026; plaintiffs acknowledged receipt of Rs.10,00,000/- in full and final settlement; compromise memo made part of the decree; no order as to costs; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed.

Issue for consideration

Claims of the plaintiffs in the suit for partition, recovery of possession and permanent injunction in O.S. No.361 of 2010, carried into second appeal after concurrent adverse findings.

Ratio / Principle

Recording the joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026, the second appeal is dismissed, and the compromise memo shall form part of the decree.

Key takeaways

There shall be no order as to costs, and consequently the connected Miscellaneous Petition (CMP(MD) No.10673 of 2022) is closed.ratio¶28

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

SA(MD) No.712 of 2022 (Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, P.B. Balaji, J.; decided 12.06.2026): Second appeal under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code by the plaintiffs against the first-appellate decree dated 05.07.2016 in A.S. No. 32 of 2012 (Principal District Judge, Karur), which had reversed the decree dated 10.07.2012 in their favour-seeking suit O.S. No. 361 of 2010 (partition, recovery of possession, permanent injunction). Pending the appeal the parties settled; a joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026, signed by all parties and counsel, was placed before the Court, the parties appeared in person, the plaintiffs admitted receipt of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) in full and final settlement, and the respondents affirmed the compromise. The appeal was dismissed with the compromise memo forming part of the decree; no order as to costs; connected Miscellaneous Petition (CMP(MD) No.10673 of 2022) closed.

A

SA(MD). No.712 of 2022

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

Dated : 12.06.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI

SA(MD). No.712 of 2022 and CMP(MD)No.10673 of 2022

V. Elangovan

M. Loganathan ... Appellants / Appellants/ Plaintiffs

Vs.

V. Amirthamani

R. Menaka

P. Pappathi

P. Mohan

R. Loganathan ... Respondents/Respondents/Defendants

PRAYER :- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 05.07.2016 in A.S. No. 32 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Karur in reversing the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2012 made in O.S. No. 361 of 2010 on the file of I^st Additional Sub court, Karur.

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

SA(MD). No.712 of 2022

For Appellants : Mr.K.Govindarajan,

For Respondents : Mr.V.Balaji

JUDGMENT

The suit for partition, recovery of possession and permanent injunction in O.S.No.361 of 2010 was dismissed by the Principal Sub Court and was affirmed in first appeal in A.S.No.32 of 2012 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Karur, aggrieved by the concurrent findings, the present second appeal has been filed by the plaintiffs.

Pending the second appeal, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes and in view of the unsuccessful claims as well, the plaintiffs have been adequately compensated by the compensated and a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- has been paid in full quit and the joint compromise memo, dated 08.04.2026 is duly signed by all the parties and their respective counsel, is presented for approval.

The parties are also present in person. The plaintiffs admit the factum of receipt of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) in full and final settlement of all the claims, though unsuccessful, before the Court 2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

SA(MD). No.712 of 2022

below and have no objection for the second appeal being dismissed, recording the compromise. The respondents are also present and affirm the said compromise as well.

In view of the above, recording the joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026, the second appeal is dismissed. The joint compromise memo, dated 08.04.2026, shall form part of the decree. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

12.06.2026

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No LS

TO

The Principal District Judge, Karur.

The I^st Additional Sub Court, Karur.

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

SA(MD). No.712 of 2022

P.B.BALAJI,J.

LS

SA(MD) No.712 of 2022

12.06.2026

4/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Claims of the plaintiffs in the suit for partition, recovery of possession and permanent injunction in O.S. No.361 of 2010, carried into second appeal after concurrent adverse findings.medium confidence¶22

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Civil Procedure Code100¶15

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Judgment and Decree dated 05.07.2016 in A.S. No. 32 of 2012 (first appeal) reversing the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2012 in O.S. No. 361 of 2010, which the appellants sought to set aside by the second appeal.¶15
Principal District Judge, Karur · 05.07.2016
Prior proceeding
Trial suit O.S. No.361 of 2010 (partition, recovery of possession and permanent injunction) dismissed; first appeal A.S. No.32 of 2012 affirmed the dismissal, giving concurrent findings against the plaintiffs, who then filed this second appeal.¶22
Prior proceeding
Pending the second appeal, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and a joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026, duly signed by all parties and their counsel, was presented for approval.¶23
Prior proceeding
Parties appeared in person; the plaintiffs admitted receipt of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) in full and final settlement of all claims despite being unsuccessful below.¶24
Prior proceeding
The plaintiffs raised no objection to the second appeal being dismissed with the compromise recorded; the respondents, also present in person, affirmed the compromise.¶27

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
V. Elangovan¶7
K. Govindarajan
appellant
M. Loganathan¶8
K. Govindarajan
respondent
V. Amirthamani¶10
V. Balaji
respondent
R. Menaka¶11
V. Balaji
respondent
P. Pappathi¶12
V. Balaji
respondent
P. Mohan¶13
V. Balaji
respondent
R. Loganathan¶14
V. Balaji

Coram

AI extract

P.B. Balajiauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 12 Jun 2026 · June
Registered: 10 Nov 2022
Case no.: SA(MD)/712/2022
CNR: HCMD012879502017
Bench: P.b. Balaji
Disposal: DISMISSED
Case type: SA(MD)

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from P.b. Balaji

S.Baluchamy Vs a.Pitchai (Dead) 1. Pappa
11 Jun 2026
Thavasimuthu, Vs Krishnamoorthy
11 Jun 2026
Tamilkodi Vs Ayyammal
11 Jun 2026
1. Rathinam (Died) 2. R.Krishnanandam Vs Valliammai (Died) Jegannathan (Died) 1. Periyasamy
12 Jun 2026
S. Rajagopal Vs K. Chandrasekaran
12 Jun 2026
Poovayee Ammal (Died) 1. Palanisamy Vs Meenakshi
12 Jun 2026

Cite this judgement

V. Elangovan, v. v. Amirthamani, SA(MD)/712/2022 (MAD), decided on 12 June 2026.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Civil Procedure Code100

View all statutes

Procedural history5

Judgment and Decree dated 05.07.2016 in A.S. No. 32 of 2012 (first appeal) reversing the judgment and decree dated 10.07.2012 in O.S. No. 361 of 2010, which the appellants sought to set aside by the second appeal.Principal District Judge, Karur · 05.07.2016
Trial suit O.S. No.361 of 2010 (partition, recovery of possession and permanent injunction) dismissed; first appeal A.S. No.32 of 2012 affirmed the dismissal, giving concurrent findings against the plaintiffs, who then filed this second appeal.
Pending the second appeal, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and a joint compromise memo dated 08.04.2026, duly signed by all parties and their counsel, was presented for approval.

View full history

Bench / Coram

P.B. Balaji

Parties & counsel