Dismissed
Vijayalakshmi v. Thisaimani
Madras HCSA(MD)/382/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this second appeal, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed the matter for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant despite prior notices.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for default. No costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A.(MD)No.382 of 2012
¶2
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
¶3
DATED : 23.03.2026
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI
¶6
S.A.(MD)No.382 of 2012
¶7
Vijayalakshmi
¶8
.. Appellant
¶9
Vs.
¶10
1.Thisaimani
¶11
2.Commissioner, Tamilnadu Raffles, 233, N S C Bose Road, Chennai – 1.
¶12
3.District Collector, Theni
¶13
4.Poonam Agarwal .. Respondents
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Vijayalakshmi
- respondent
Thisaimani
- respondent
Commissioner, Tamilnadu Raffles
- respondent
District Collector, Theni
- respondent
Poonam Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court