Srinivasan v. Solai
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC dismissed for default on counsel's endorsement of 'no instructions'; no other representation for appellant; no costs; connected C.M.P. closed; Madras High Court, single judge (S.Sounthar, J.), 13.03.2026; underlying challenge to Additional Sub Judge, Tindivanam confirmation (A.S.No.14 of 2017) of Principal District Munsif Court, Tindivanam decree (O.S.No.160 of 2011) left undecided; no precedent cited, no substantive issue adjudicated.
What did the court decide?
As the learned counsel for the appellant had endorsed in the Court bundle that he had no instructions from his client and there was no other representation for the appellant, this Court recorded the endorsement, dismissed the Second Appeal for default with no costs, and closed the connected civil miscellaneous petition. ¶25