Ramadoss v. v.Sujatha
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals against concurrent findings dismissing declaration and injunction suits challenging two sale deeds as forged. The court held the deeds genuine, the claims hopelessly barred by limitation, and possession follows title; appeals dismissed with costs.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeals dismissed with cost; connected CMPs closed.
What the court decided
2026:MHC:1241
S.A.Nos.437and 470 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
RESERVED ON : 13.03.2026
PRONOUNCED ON : 25.03.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A.Nos.437 and 470 of 2023 and C.M.P.Nos.13249, 13250 and 14349 of 2023
S.A.No.437 of 2023 :
1.Ramadoss 2.Jayalakshmi 3.Narayanan ... Appellants
vs.
V.Sujatha ... Respondents
PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.23 of 2021 dated 17.10.2022 on the file of the VI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai thereby confirming the Judgment and Decree made in O.S.No.1571 of 2011 on the file of the III Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai dated 28.11.2019 thereby allow the Second Appeal and dismiss the suit.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Sale Deed dated 20.08.1984 allegedly executed by Sarada was forged.
Whether the suit challenging the sale deeds was barred by limitation.
Whether the respondent was entitled to a decree for injunction.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramadoss
- appellant
Jayalakshmi
- appellant
Narayanan
- respondent
V.Sujatha
- respondent
Jesu Michael
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court