Dismissed¶22

Mohamed Yousuf v. Thiru.Ramakrishna Chettiar

Madras HC17 Jun 2026SA/366/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; S.A.No.366 of 2024; Mohamed Yousuff vs Ramakrishna Chettiar; second appeal dismissed for default; non-prosecution; no representation for appellant; counsel unable to get instructions; cause-list; Section 100 Code of Civil Procedure; A.S.No.289 of 2012; XVII Additional Judge City Civil Court Chennai; O.S.No.3658 of 2008; XIII Assistant City Civil Judge Chennai; no costs; decided 17.06.2026; S.Sounthar, J.

What did the court decide?

The Second Appeal is dismissed for default with no costs, as there was no representation for the appellant on the hearing dates despite his name being printed in the cause-list, and his counsel could not obtain instructions from him. ¶22

Mohamed Yousuf Vs Thiru.Ramakrishna Chettiar — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.No.366 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.06.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

S.A.No.366 of 2024

¶7

Mohamed Yousuff ... Appellant

¶8

vs.

¶9

Ramakrishna Chettiar ... Respondent

¶10

PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.289 of 2012 dated 12.03.2013 on the file of the learned XVII Additional Judge, City Civil Court at Chennai which was confirmed the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.3658 of 2008 dated 04.11.2011 passed by the learned XIII Assistant City Civil Judge at Chennai.

¶11

For Appellant : Mr.B.Sundara Pandian

¶12

J U D G M E N T

¶13

When the Second Appeal came up for hearing on 15.06.2026, there

¶14

was no representation for the appellant in the forenoon as well as afternoon. Hence, in order to give an opportunity to the appellant, the Registry was directed to list the matter on 17.06.2026 under the caption 'for dismissal’.

¶15

1/4

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

S.A.No.366 of 2024

¶18

Today, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant would

¶19

submit that inspite of his best efforts, he is unable to get instructions from the appellant. The said statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant is recorded.

¶20