Dismissed¶28

Panneerselvam v. Sundarraj @ Arumugam

Madras HC2 Apr 2026SA/294/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; SA No. 294 of 2025 and CMP.No.8653 of 2025; S. Sounthar J.; second appeal under Section 100 CPC; dismissed as withdrawn on settlement/compromise memo dated 23.03.2026; connected miscellaneous petition closed; no costs; impugned decree AS No.11 of 2019 dated 20.12.2024 (Principal Subordinate Court, Tindivanam) partly reversing OS No.66 of 2013 decree dated 02.04.2019 (District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur); appellants Kasiammal (deceased) and Panneerselvam vs respondents incl. Sundarraj @ Arumugam, Kothandapani, Deivasigamani, Ezhumalai, Arumugam @ Sekar, Kaliyamoorthy, Ethiraj, Selvi, Hanibal Nehru, Subramani; counsel T. Sai Krishnan (appellants), M/s V.Kamala Kumar (R10); no precedent cited; no quantum involved; non-speaking order (nr).

Panneerselvam Vs Sundarraj @ Arumugam — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

SA No. 294 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 02-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR

¶6

SA No. 294 of 2025 and CMP.No.8653 of 2025

Kasiammal (Died).

Panneerselvam

..Appellant(s)

Sundarraj @ Arumugam

¶12

Kothandapani

¶13

Deivasigamani

¶14

Ezhumalai

¶15

Arumugam @ Sekar

¶16

Kaliyamoorthy

¶17

Ethiraj

¶18

Selvi

¶19

Hanibal Nehru

¶20

10.Subramani

¶21

..Respondent(s)

¶22

Prayer : Second appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure code, praying to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 20.12.2024 in AS No.11 of 2019 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Tindivanam, thereby partly reversing the judgment and decree dated 02.04.2019 in OS No.66 of 2013 on the file of the District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Vanur.

¶23

For Appellant(s): T. Sai Krishnan For Respondent(s): M/s V.Kamala Kumar for R10 R9- served- no appearance R2 to R7 - Unclaimed R1 & R8-Tapal not yet returned either served or unserved

¶24

Page1 of 3

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

SA No. 294 of 2025

¶27

JUDGMENT

¶28

The learned counsel for the appellant filed a memo dated 23.03.2026 stating that the dispute between the parties have been settled and hence, nothing survives for consideration in the above second appeal. She also seeks leave of the court to withdraw the second appeal. The memo filed by the learned counsel for the appellant dated 23.03.2026 is recorded. The second appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶29

02-04-2026

¶30

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No nr

¶31

¶32