Dismissed¶61

T.Mahalingam(Died) v. Nataraja Pallai (Died)

Madras HC6 Jul 2026SA/1597/1999

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution of second appeal; no appearance by appellants; counsel reported no instructions; no costs; S.A.No.1597 of 1999; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; G.R.Swaminathan J.; Section 100 CPC; A.S.No.215 of 1998 District Court Tiruchirapalli; O.S.No.434 of 1995 Sub Court Kulithalai; LRs impleaded 2017-2025.

What did the court decide?

The second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, as there was no appearance on the side of the appellants and the learned counsel had reported no instructions; no costs awarded. ¶61

T.Mahalingam(Died) Vs Nataraja Pallai (Died) — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.No.1597 of 1999

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 06.07.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

S.A.No.1597 of 1999

¶7

1.T.Mahalingam (Died)

¶8

2.Ranganayagi

¶9

3.Thangamuthu

¶10

4.Meenakshi

¶11

5.Dhanalakshmi

¶12

6.Karthikeyan

¶13

... Appellants

¶14

(Appellants 2 to 6 are brought on record as Lrs of the deceased sole appellant vide order dated 04.12.2017 in C.M.P.(MD)No.983 of 2004 by MKKSJ)

¶15

Vs.

¶16

1.Nataraja Pallai (Died)

¶17

2.Palaniandy Konar

¶18

3.Iya Pichai

¶19

4.Issac Vadhiyar

¶20

5.Arokiasamy

¶21

6.Karupannan

¶22

7.Muthu Gounder (Exonerated)

¶23

8.Kamatchi (Died)

¶24

9.Muthulakshmi (Died)

¶25

10.Thangammal (Died)

¶26

1/6

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

S.A.No.1597 of 1999

¶29

11.N.Muthukrishnan

¶30

12.Santhi @ S.Palaniammal

13.N.Somasundaram

14.N.Thangamuthu

15.Sarasu

16.Mennakshmi

17.Mahalakshmi

18.Sivakamasundari

(Respondents 11 to 18 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased first respondent vide order dated 29.03.2022 in C.M.P.No.7319 of 2002 in S.A.No.1597 of 1999 by RTJ)

19.Kandasamy

20.Thirumoorthy

21.Shanthakumari

22.Dhivya Bharathi

(Respondents 19 to 22 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased eighth respondent vide order dated 22.08.2023 in C.M.P(MD)Nos.12830, 12833 and 12834 of 2022 in S.A.No.1597 of 1999 by KRJ)

¶43

23.K.Jeyaraman

¶44

24.Rengarathinam

¶45

(Respondents 23 & 24 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased ninth respondent vide order dated 23.01.2023 in C.M.P (MD)Nos.12838, 12839 and 12841 of 2022 in S.A.No.1597 of 1999 by SSJ)

¶46

(Name of 24th Respondent is amended vide order dated 08.01.2025 made in CMP(MD)No.18569 of 2024 in SA.No. 1597 of 1999 by VSGJ).

¶47

25.Raman

¶48

26.Subramani

¶49

27.Kaveri @ Dhanalakshmi

¶50

2/6

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

S.A.No.1597 of 1999

¶53

28.Jeyalakshmi

¶54

... Respondents

¶55

(Respondents 25 to 28 are crought on record as LRs of the deceased 10th Respondent vide order dated 23.01.2023 made in C.M.P.(MD)Nos.12842, 12843 and 12848 of 2022 in S.A.No.1597 of 1999 by SSJ)

¶56

Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 23.03.1999 made in A.S.No.215 of 1998 on the file of the District Court, Tiruchirapalli, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 13.04.1998 made in O.S.No.434 of 1995 on the file of the Sub Court, Kulithalai.

¶57

For Appellants : No appearance

¶58

For Respondents : Mr.K.Govindarajan for R12 to R18

¶59

JUDGEMENT

¶60

There is no appearance on the side of the appellants. The learned counsel

¶61

had also reported no instructions. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

¶62

06.07.2026