Dismissed¶18

Sri Anjaneya, Sri Raghavendra v. R.Mohanasundaram Alias Balu

Madras HC6 Mar 2026SA/1211/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court; S.A.No.1211 of 2012; M.P.No.1 of 2012; second appeal dismissed for default; non-prosecution; appellant absent on 04.03.2026 and 06.03.2026; Section 100 Civil Procedure Code; A.S.No.46 of 2011; O.S.No.419 of 1995; I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode; Principal District Munsif, Erode; temple trust appellant (Sri Anjaneya, Sri Raghavendraswamy, Thirukkovil); no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed; K.Govindarajan Thilakavadi, J.; decision dated 06.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

None to the appellant; second appeal dismissed for default with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition (M.P.No.1 of 2012) closed. ¶18

Sri Anjaneya, Sri Raghavendra Vs R.Mohanasundaram Alias Balu — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

S.A.No.1211 of 2012

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 06.03.2026

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

¶6

S.A.No.1211 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012

¶7

Sri Anjaneya, Sri Raghavendraswamy, Thirukkovil, represented by its Managing, Trustee Smt. Kuppulakshmi Sub Registrar Office Street, Karungalpalayam, Erode

¶8

...Appellant

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

1.R.Mohanasundaram alias Balu 2.P.Panneerselvam 3.Kathamuthu 4.Saravanan 5.Sakthivel (3^rd respondent was exparte in the Courts below and hence given up)

¶11

...Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, seeking to set aside the judgment and decree of the learned I Additional Subordinate Judge, Erode in A.S.No.46 of 2011 dated 19.06.2012 confirming the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Munsif, Erode in O.S.No.419 of 1995 dated 23.02.211.

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

S.A.No.1211 of 2012

¶16

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Arunmozhi Devan for Mr.S.M.S.Shriram Narayanan for R1 & R2 Notice dispensed with for R3 to R5

¶17

ORDER

¶18

When the matter was listed on 04.03.2026, there was no representation on the appellant side. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the case under the caption for dismissal on 06.03.2026. Even today (06.03.2026), When the matter was called, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondents 1 & 2 present before this Court. Hence, the second appeal stands dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶19

06.03.2026

¶20

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No vsn

¶21

2/4

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

S.A.No.1211 of 2012

¶24

¶25