R.Meenal v. v. Swaminathan
Case brief
What is this about?
Review application seeking recall of an earlier writ order was closed after counsel produced a demand draft of Rs.75,000 favouring the review applicant; parties' rights left to abide by the outcome of a pending civil suit.
What did the court decide?
Review application closed on payment of Rs.75,000/- demand draft to applicant; no costs.
What the court decided
REV.APLW(MD) No. 189 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14-07-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN REV.APLW(MD) No. 189 of 2024 in W.P.(MD)No.25665 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)Nos.19237 & 19238 of 2024
R.Meenal W/o.Late.Ramalingam, Keela Vadakkur Village, Angadimangalam Post, Madurai District 625 201
..Petitioner(s)/LR of the deceased 5th respondent A.Ramalingam
Vs
- V. Swaminathan S/o.Veerapathiran, Keela Vadakkur Village, Angadimangalam Post, Madurai District 625 201. … 1st Respondent / Petitioner
- The District Collector Collectorate Campus, Madurai. Madurai District
- The Tahsildar East Taluk, Narasingam, Othakadai, Madurai, Madurai District
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order dated 20.10.2023 in W.P.(MD)No.25665 of 2023 should be reviewed and recalled.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
R.Meenal
- respondent
V.Swaminathan
- respondent
The District Collector, Madurai District
- respondent
The Tahsildar, East Taluk, Madurai
- respondent
The Head Surveyor, Survey and Land Records Department, East Taluk
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court