Dismissed¶22

A.M.A. Rawoof v. Saifuddin

Madras HC23 Mar 2026OSA/32/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

O.S.A.No.32 of 2018, Madras High Court, decided 23.03.2026 by P.Velmurugan, J. with K.Govindarajan Thilakavadi, J.; Original Side Appeal from suit C.S.No.858 of 2010 dismissed as abated due to death of first respondent/plaintiff in 2021 and failure to bring legal representatives on record; connected CMPs 1872 of 2018 and 13856 of 2020 closed; no costs; no substantive adjudication of suit claims.

What did the court decide?

Since the first respondent/plaintiff died in 2021 and his legal representatives were never brought on record, the appeal cannot be effectively proceeded with and no useful purpose would be served in keeping it pending. ¶22

A.M.A. Rawoof Vs Saifuddin — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

O.S.A.No.32 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 23.03.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

¶7

O.S.A.No.32 of 2018 and C.M.P.Nos.1872 of 2018 & 13856 of 2020

¶8

A.M.A.Rawoof S/o.C.Miya Sahib ... Appellant

¶9

Vs.

¶10

Saifuddin S/o.Thahir Ali

¶11

John Raja S/o.J.L.A.Pandian ... Respondents

¶12

Original Side Appeal filed under Order XXXVI, Rule 1 of the Madras High Court Original Side Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in C.S.No.858 of 2010, dated 02.03.2017 on the file of this Court.

¶13

For Appellant : Mr.B.Harikrishnan For Respondents : R1 – Died R2 – Not ready in notice

¶14

¶15

1/3

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

O.S.A.No.32 of 2018

¶18

J U D G M E N T

¶19

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.VELMURUGAN, J. )

¶20

The first defendant, who is unsuccessful in C.S.No.858 of 2010, dated 02.03.2017, has filed the present appeal, challenging the decree passed in favour of the first respondent/plaintiff.

¶21

2. It is seen from the case records that the first respondent/plaintiff died in the year 2021 and no steps have been taken to bring on record his legal representatives till date. The second respondent herein is the second defendant in the suit, who is only a formal party.

¶22

3. In such circumstances, this Court finds that the appeal cannot be effectively proceeded with and no useful purpose would be served in keeping the same pending. Accordingly, the Original Side Appeal stands dismissed as abated. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶23

(P.V.,J.) (K.G.T.,J.) 23.03.2026

¶24

ms Speaking / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No

¶25

2/3

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

O.S.A.No.32 of 2018

¶28

P.VELMURUGAN, J., and K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.,