Dismissed¶33

Sri.B.v.Madhusudan Maharaj v. Sri Sachidananda Bramachari

Madras HC19 Jan 2026OSA/125/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

OSA dismissed as withdrawn — Madras High Court — Sri.B.V.Madhusudan Maharaj v. Sri Sachidananda Bramachari & ors. — counsel Ravi Raja Bappu's letter seeking withdrawal — appeal under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent — impugned order dated 15.06.2023 in Application No.2461 of 2023 in C.S.No. 899 of 2004 (R.N.Manjula, J.) — no costs — CMP Nos.15822 & 15824 of 2023 closed — bench: C.V.Karthikeyan and K.Kumaresh Babu, JJ. — decided 19-01-2026.

What did the court decide?

Appeal dismissed as withdrawn at the request of the appellant; no costs; connected miscellaneous petitions (CMP Nos.15822 & 15824 of 2023) closed. ¶33

Sri.B.v.Madhusudan Maharaj Vs Sri Sachidananda Bramachari — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

OSA No. 125 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 19-01-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN

¶6

AND

¶7

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶8

OSA No. 125 of 2023 and CMP Nos.15822 & 15824 of 2023

¶9

Sri.B.V.Madhusudan Maharaj

¶10

..Appellant(s)

¶11

¶12

Sri Sachidananda Bramachari

¶13

Sri Parameshwar Brahmachari

¶14

Sri Prabhupada Das Brahmachari

¶15

Sripat Lalit Krishna Brahamachari Disciple of Tridaniswami Bhati Vilas, Tirtha of Goswami Maharaj.

¶16

Sripat Sujan Krishna Brahmachari Disciple of Tridaniswami Bhakthi Vilas, Tirtha Goswami Maharaj.

¶17

Mayapur Shree Chaitanya Math Rep by its Acharya And General Secretary H H Bhakthi Swarupe Sanyasi Maharaj, Regd Office at Nabadwip P.O Nadia Dist., West Bengal.

¶18

Sri Gaudiya Math Devotees Association, Chennai (Reg No.190/2005), 5/9, Shanmugham Street, Ratna Naar, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014

¶19

__________Page 1 of 4

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

OSA No. 125 of 2023

¶22

represented by 1. Dr.Debashis Roy - President 2. L.R.Karunakaran – Secretary 3. Man Mohan Mittal - Treasurer

¶23

..Respondent(s)

¶24

Prayer: Appeal filed under Order XXXVI Rule 9 of O.S. Rules read with Clause 15 of Letters Patent against the decreetal and fair order passed by the Hon’ble Mrs.Justice R.N.Manjula in Application No.2461 of 2023 in C.S.No. 899 of 2004 dated 15.06.2023.

¶25

For Appellant(s):	Ravi Raja Bappu
For Respondent(s):	Mr. Sundar Narayan for R1 to R3
	Mr.N.Sathyamurthy for R6
	Mr.B.Ravi for R7
	No appearance–R4 & R5

¶26

JUDGMENT

¶27

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by C.V.Karthikeyan, J.)

¶28

The learned counsel for the appellant had given the following letter to the Registrar Judicial, which reads as follows:

¶29

I was instructed by my client Sri.B.V.Madhusudan Maharaj to withdraw the above O.S.A. I request your goodselves to list the matter before the concerned portfolio Judges at the earliest to enable its withdrawal.

¶30

__________Page 2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

OSA No. 125 of 2023

¶33

2.In view of the said letter, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶34

No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed.

¶35

(C.V.K.,J.) (K.B.,J.) 19-01-2026