B.Manickam Tagore Vs v.Vijaya Prabhakaran

9.C.Muthukannu 10.G.Ganeshamoorthi 11.N.Sankaranarayanan 12.M.Sudalaimani 13.M.Selvakumar 14.V.V.Selvarajan 15.K.Selvi 16.K.Palanisamy 17.R.Pandiyammal 18.P.Mahendra Ramakrishnan 19.M.Manikandan 20.Mayak Kannan 21. M.Marieeswari 22.S.Rajagopal 23.Rajesh 24.V.K.Venkateswaran 25.Vedha @ Dhamodharan

¶16

1 / 32

*S.No.*	*Date & Time*	*Place*	*Agents of R1* *who bribed*	*Name of voters* *who were* *bribed*	*Name of* *persons who* *witness the* *incident*
1.	09.04.2024 at	Uchapatti	1.Seeni	Rangaraj	1.N.Kalyanasun
	7.00 pm	Village	2.Karuppaiah	S/o.Veluchami	daram
			3.Pandi		S/o.Natarajan

*S.No.*	*Date & Time*	*Place*	*Agents of R1* *who bribed*	*Name of voters* *who were* *bribed*	*Name of* *persons who* *witness the* *incident*
					2.A.Ravi Alagarsamy S/o.Alagarsamy
2.	09.04.2024 at 7.00 pm	Uchapatti Village	1.Seeni 2.Karuppaiah 3.Pandi	Vijayaram Bharathi S/o.Alagarsamy	1.N.Kalyanasun daram S/o.Natarajan 2.A.Ravi Alagarsamy S/o.Alagarsamy
3.	09.04.2024 at 7.00 pm	Uchapatti Village	1.Seeni 2.Karuppaiah 3.Pandi	Kannan S/o.Balu	1.N.Kalyanasun daram S/o.Natarajan 2.A.Ravi Alagarsamy S/o.Alagarsamy
4.	09.04.2024 at 7.00 pm	Uchapatti Village	1.Seeni 2.Karuppaiah 3.Pandi	Kannan S/o.Guruvan	1.N.Kalyanasun daram S/o.Natarajan 2.A.Ravi Alagarsamy S/o.Alagarsamy
5.	09.04.2024 at 7.30 pm	Pallakka Pudupatti Village	1.Seeni 2.Karuppaiah 3.Pandi	Vivek S/o.Ramani	1.Vinoth Kumar S/o.Koppaiyan 2.Ram Kumar S/o.Pandi
6.	09.04.2024 at 7.30 pm	Pallakka Pudupatti Village	1.Seeni 2.Karuppaiah 3.Pandi	Ajith S/o.Rajagopal	1.Vinoth Kumar S/o.Koppaiyan 2.Ram Kumar S/o.Pandi
7.	09.04.2024 at 7.30 pm	Pallakka Pudupatti Village	1.Seeni 2.Karuppaiah 3.Pandi	Rajesakar S/o.Gurusamy	1.Vinoth Kumar S/o.Koppaiyan 2.Ram Kumar S/o.Pandi
8.	09.04.2024 at	Pallakka	1.Seeni	Pandiann	1.Vinoth

*Para-wise*	*Contentions*
7-12	Contains sweeping and bald allegations without any material particulars. No materials facts concerning criminal antecedents and assets allegedly suppressed by the Returned Candidate in his nomination.
13-16	The issuance of Guarantee Card does not amount to corrupt practice, the scheme is part of the manifesto of the Party. It is onlythepromise of future Government.
17-19	The promises under Guarantee Card is from political manfiesto and the same is based on the circular dated 02.05.2024, Election Commission imposed prohibition, but, before that the said date election was completed in Tamil Nadu on 19.04.2024.
20-22	The election petitioner did not state that he had personally witnessed,but,on verification,the electionpetitioner stated

*Para-wise*	*Contentions*
	that he had personal knowledge. Merely stating some names, places, date and time without producing any documents or evidence that the offence was committed with the consent of returned candidates,the allegations are not maintainable.
23	The Election Petitioner has not raised any objection for the acceptance of the said procedure being followed by the Returning Officer. The allegation did not raise cause of action and arepurelybywayof an afterthought
24	No complaint was given for the alleged booth capturing, in the absence of the same,it remains onlyas bald allegations.
25-26	No objections were raised duringthe countingof votes
27-28	Regarding the stoppage of the counting, no material particulars in support of the allegations have been filed. No complaint was raised during the counting of votes regarding the stoppage of counting.
29-39	No complaint was given during the counting process, in the absence of the same,it remains onlyas bald allegations.
40-43	No material proofs have been filed with regard to the excess expenditure incurred by the Returning Candidate, in the absence of the same,it remains onlyas bald allegations.

What is this about?

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raman Vs The District Collector

V.Marimuthu Vs The Commissioner of Land Administration

Mariyayee Vs The District Collector

Abarna Vs M.Manikandan (Died) , M.Tara