Allowed¶34

Yamunarani T and 2 others v. K. Hari Babu and 3 Others

Madras HC9 Feb 2026OA/1009/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interim injunction; restraint on creation of encumbrances; alienation of suit schedule property; third-party rights; declaration and permanent injunction suit; Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC; Order XIV Rule 8 Original Side Rules; Madras High Court Original Side; OA 1009 of 2025; C.S.246 of 2025; Sub-Registrar Anna Nagar; no objection by counsel for respondents 1 and 4; respondents 2 and 3 no appearance; applicants as plaintiffs and owners.

What did the court decide?

Interim injunction restraining respondents 1, 2 and 3 from creating any encumbrance in the schedule mentioned property till the disposal of suit C.S.No.246 of 2025. ¶34

Yamunarani T and 2 others Vs K. Hari Babu and 3 Others — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

OA No. 1009 of 2025

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09-02-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶6

OA No. 1009 of 2025 in C.S.No.246 of 2025

¶7

Yamunarani T

¶8

Hanisha Tumati

¶9

Keerthisha Tumati

¶10

..Applicants

¶11

¶12

K. Hari Babu

¶13

K.Ramesh Babu

¶14

K.Prabhakar

¶15

The Sub-Registrar

¶16

Sub-Registrar Office Anna Nagar,

¶17

Nolambur 2nd Main Road,

Nolambur Phase-II

Chennai-600 037

..Respondents

This Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules read with under Order XXXIX, Rule 1 and 2 of CPC, to grant interim injunction restraining the Respondents 1, 2 and 3 from in anyway creating any encumbrance in the schedule mentioned property, till the disposal of the above suit.

¶22

__________ Page1 of 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

OA No. 1009 of 2025

¶25

For Applicants: Ms.D.Selvakumari For Respondents: Mr.R.Vigneswaran (R4) Ms.M.Vishali for Mr.K.Govi Ganesan (R1) R2 and R3 (No appearance)

¶26

ORDER

¶27

This Application has been filed praying for a grant of interim injunction restraining the respondents 1,2 and 3 from any way creating any encumbrance in the schedule mentioned property, till the disposal of the above suit.

¶28

According to the applicants, they are the plaintiffs in the suit filed for declaration and permanent injunction. The applicants are the owners of the suit schedule property. The respondents 1 to 3 have no right or title over the said property, however, they are making an attempt to alienate and encumber the suit schedule property. It is further stated that if any 3^rd party right is created, it will affect the rights of the plaintiff with respect to suit schedule property.

¶29

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. There is no representation for the respondents 2 and 3. The learned counsel appearing for R1 and R4 have stated no objection for allowing this application.

¶30

__________ Page2 of 4

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

OA No. 1009 of 2025

¶33

Considering the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this

¶34

application and considering the fact that if any 3^rd party right is created with respect to suit schedule property, the plaintiffs right will be affected, this application is allowed.

09-02-2026

arr (1/2)

The Sub-Registrar Sub-Registrar Office Anna Nagar, Nolambur 2nd Main Road, Nolambur Phase-II Chennai-37

¶39

__________ Page3 of 4

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41