M.P.Maharajan v. Nil
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an Insolvency Petition for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear or take steps for substituted service, resulting in the dismissal of the petition filed under the P.T.I Act and Insolvency Rules.
What did the court decide?
No costs. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
What the court decided
IP No. 41 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03-07-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU
IP No. 41 of 2023
M.P.Maharajan
S/o.Pandiaraj, No.19, Trust Square Street, Ramalingapuram Perambur Barracks, Chennai-600012.
..Petitioner(s)/Debtor(s)
Vs
Nil Nil
..Respondent(s)
Prayer: Petition under section 9(1) F 10,11,14,15,of the P.T.I Act and Order III Rule (1) and Order XVIII Rule 1 of the Insolvency Rules 1909, praying to adjudicate the Petitioner is as insolvent. Direct the Official Assignee to administer the estate of the petitioner in regular manner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.P. Maharajan
Coram
K.KUMARESH BABU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Master
- Order 2 — this page · K.kumaresh Babu
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court