Chinnammal v. Kalavathy
Case brief
What is this about?
C.R.P. (MD) No. 964 of 2023; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice N.Senthilkumar; Article 227 Constitution of India; civil revision petition; temporary injunction; I.A. No. 191 of 2017; O.S. No. 187 of 2017; C.M.A. No. 16 of 2017; Principal District Munsif Court Tiruchirappalli; IV Additional Sub-Court Tiruchirappalli; disposed with clarification; fresh application to be decided afresh on merits; expedited hearing directive (two hearings per month); quarterly reports to Registrar (Judicial); no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition disposed with a clarification that any fresh Temporary Injunction application before the Trial Court shall be decided afresh on merits, uninhibited and uninfluenced by the impugned order; Trial Court directed to hold at least two effective hearings monthly with quarterly reports to the Registrar (Judicial) till final orders; no costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.