Parvathiammal v. Sankarraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Condonation of delay refused; restoration of suit dismissed for default denied. Keywords: condonation of delay 1933 days; petition to restore suit; suit dismissed for default 23.04.2018; O.S.No.335 of 2015; I.A. No.2 of 2024; Principal District Munsif Court Thoothukudi; Article 227 Constitution of India; Civil Revision Petition C.R.P(MD); Register No.19 civil register entry absent; P.W.1 oral evidence only; no documentary evidence; inordinate delay nearly 5½ years; absence of sufficient cause; non-interference with trial Court order; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; Justice N.Senthilkumar; petitioners Parvathiammal and Shanmugathai; respondents Sankarraj, Priya, Saravana Raja, Dhilip Kumar, Jeyakumar, Jeyasankar, V.P. Holdings (Purchase Executive Rabin Xeroge); counsel Mr.Sivathilakar; dismissed as devoid of merits; no costs; decided 10.02.2026.
What did the court decide?
This Court found that no documentary evidence had been produced to substantiate the reasons assigned for the delay.