Dismissed¶25

M.Manohar v. S.R.Sivathanu

Madras HC7 Jan 2026CRP(MD)/3024/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, Madurai Bench; N.Senthilkumar, J.; 07.01.2026; C.R.P(MD) No.3024 of 2025; C.M.P(MD) No.17118 of 2025; Article 227; docket order 16.10.2025; E.P. No.4 of 2024; R.C.O.P.No.37 of 2018; III Additional District Munsif Madurai Town; tenant M.Manohar vs S.R.Sivathanu; duplicate revision petition unwarranted; undertaking to vacate premises recorded in C.R.P(MD) No.2331 of 2025; arrears of rent Rs.50,000 deposited by Demand Draft (Canara Bank, 13.10.2025); previous CRP order binding; CRP dismissed, connected CMP closed, no costs.

What did the court decide?

Since the previous C.R.P(MD) No.2331 of 2025 and the present C.R.P were filed for the very same relief and the undertaking is already recorded, the present C.R.P is unwarranted. ¶19

M.Manohar Vs S.R.Sivathanu — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

CRP(MD). No.3024 of 2025

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

Dated : 07.01.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶6

C.R.P(MD). No.3024 of 2025 and C.M.P(MD) No.17118 of 2025

¶7

M.Manohar ... Petitioner/Respondent/Respondent Vs

¶8

S.R.Sivathanu ... Respondent / Petitioner/ Petitioner

¶9

PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to allow this Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the impugned docket order, dated 16.10.2025 was passed in E.P. No.4 of 2024 in R.C.O.P.No.37 of 2018 on the file of the III Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town.

¶10

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Rajalakshmi for Mr.K.Mahendran

¶11

ORDER

¶12

The present Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the docket order passed in E.P.No.4 of 2024 in R.C.O.P.No.37 of 2018 on the file of

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

CRP(MD). No.3024 of 2025

¶16

the III Additional District Munsif, Madurai Town, dated 16.10.2025.

¶17

The revision petitioner, who is the tenant, has filed C.R.P(MD) No.2331 of 2025 and an undertaking was filed on 20.08.2025 seeking six months time to vacate the premises. This Court had recorded the same and directed the revision petitioner to deposit the arrears of rent i.e. Rs.50,000/-.

¶18

The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submits that they have paid the amount of Rs.50,000/- to the respondent herein by way of Demand Draft drawn in Canara Bank, dated 13.10.2025 and it has been duly received by the counsel for the respondent on 15.10.2025.

¶19

The present CRP is filed to set aside the docket order and since an undertaking is recorded, previous CRP and present CRP are filed for the very same relief as already undertaking is recorded in previous C.R.P(MD) No.2331 of 2025, the present C.R.P is unwarranted. It is made clear that the revision petitioner shall vacate the premises as per the

¶20

2/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

CRP(MD). No.3024 of 2025

¶23

undertaking given in the previous C.R.P and the order passed in the

¶24

previous C.R.P is binding on the revision petitioner.

¶25