Kuljeetkaur v. Saravanaraja Muthusamy
Case brief
What is this about?
A mention petition regarding a divorce petition disposed of by the Trial Court despite this Court's earlier directions. The petitioner sought time to file a fresh revision petition under Article 227 to set aside the Trial Court's order, and the Court recorded that no further order was needed.
What the court decided
CRP No. 3402 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02-07-2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE CRP No. 3402 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 14780 OF 2026
Kuljeetkaur
Petitioner(s)
Vs
Saravanaraja Muthusamy
Respondent(s)
For petitioner: Mr.Abrar Mohamed Abdullah for Mr.M.Guruprasad For Respondent(s): Mr.T.Gowthaman, Senior Counsel for Mr.B.Pachaiyappan
ORDER
This matter is listed under the caption for being mentioned’ on a request made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kuljeetkaur
- respondent
Saravanaraja Muthusamy
Coram
Abdul Quddhose
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court