Dismissed¶23

D.Baskaran v. Arcot Luthern Church

Madras HC15 Apr 2026CRP/2017/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRP No. 2017 of 2022; CMP No. 10346 of 2022; D. Baskaran; Arcot Luthern Church; Commissioner Corporation of Chennai; Madras High Court; statutory tenant; Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1970; O.S.No. 4277 of 2018; I.A.No. 2 of 2021; VII Assistant City Civil Court Chennai; revision petition dismissed as infructuous; nothing survives for adjudication; petitioner vacated suit premises; no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Recording the dismissal of the petitioner's suit and his vacation of the premises, the Court held that no order is required to be adjudicated in the petition, and accordingly dismissed the Civil Revision Petition. ¶23

D.Baskaran Vs Arcot Luthern Church — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRP No. 2017 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 15-04-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶6

CRP No. 2017 of 2022 and CMP No. 10346 of 2022

D.Baskaran

..Petitioner(s)

Arcot Luthern Church Rep.by Secretary, Rajamanickam, Secretary-in-charge At No. 166, Broadway, Chennai-600 108.

¶11

The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai, Chennai-600 003.

¶12

..Respondent(s)

¶13

Prayer : This petition has been filed to set aside the fair order and decreetal order in I.A.No. 2 of 2021 in O.S.No. 4277 of 2018 dated 22.3.2022 on the file of the VII Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

¶14

For Petitioner(s): No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.P.N.George Graham For M/s.Devadason & Sagar (R1) Not ready in notice - R2

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

No representation for the petitioner.

¶17

However, the learned counsel for the first respondent would submit

¶18

that the Suit filed by the petitioner had been dismissed and he had also vacated

¶19

the suit premises and therefore, nothing survives in the present petition to be adjudicated.

¶20

Page1 of 3

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

CRP No. 2017 of 2022

¶23

Recording the same and noting that the Suit filed by the petitioner to declare himself as a statutory tenant had been dismissed and also his claim for protection of rights under the Madras City Tenants Protection Act, 1970 and the petitioner had also vacated the suit premises, no order is required to be adjudicated in the petition and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed.

¶24

15-04-2026

¶25

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶26

Maya

¶27

¶28