Dismissed¶20

Krishna Devi @ Kannathal v. Veera Rk Arunachalam

Madras HC26 Mar 2026CRP/1206/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution/default of Article 227 revision petitions; petitioner Krishna Devi @ Kannathal (D/o. N. Senthamarai Kannappan); respondent Veera RK Arunachalam (S/o. VR Arunachalam); challenged orders dated 22-03-2022 in Crl.M.P.Nos.11107 & 11106 of 2021 in D.V.C.No.18 of 2019 before XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai; no representation on 18.03.2026, 25.03.2026 and 26.03.2026 ('For Dismissal' caption); dismissed without costs; connected CMP.Nos.6444 & 6446 of 2022 closed; Madras High Court; K.KUMARESH BABU J.; decision date 26-03-2026; no merits decided.

What did the court decide?

Having regard to the absence of representation by the petitioner on three successive hearing dates, it is evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petitions. ¶20

Krishna Devi @ Kannathal Vs Veera Rk Arunachalam — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

CRP Nos. 1206 & 1207 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-03-2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU

¶5

CRP Nos. 1206 & 1207 of 2022 & CMP.Nos.6444 & 6446 of 2022

¶6

Krishna Devi @ Kannathal D/o. N. Senthamarai Kannappan, No.6, 5^th Cross Street, Karpagam Garden, Adyar, Chennai - 600 020. Resided while filing the DVC No.18 of 2019 at Block No. VI, Flat No.1B, Ranimeyyammai Towers, MRC Nagar, R.A.Puram, Chennai - 600028 Person.

¶7

..Petitioner(s) in both CRPs

¶8

¶9

Veera RK Arunachalam S/o. VR Arunachalam, No.6, 5^th Cross Street, Karpagam Garden, Adyar, Chennai -600 020.

¶10

..Respondent(s) in both CRPs

¶11

Common Prayer: These Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records in Crl.M.P.Nos.11107 & 11106 of 2021 in D.V.C.No.18 of 2019 on the file of the Learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet at Chennai dated 22-03-2022 and set aside the same.

¶12

For Petitioner(s): No appearance

¶13

For Respondent(s): No appearance

¶14

__________ Page1 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRP Nos. 1206 & 1207 of 2022

¶17

Common Order

¶18

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 18.03.2026, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner, either in person or through the learned counsel. Hence, this Court directed the matter to be listed on 25.03.2026.

¶19

Again, when the matter was taken up for hearing on 25.03.2026, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. In order to grant one more opportunity, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter on 26.03.2026 (today) under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.

¶20

Even today, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Hence, it is evident that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petitions. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petitions stand dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶21

26-03-2026

¶22

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶23

TSG

¶24

__________ Page2 of 4

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

CRP Nos. 1206 & 1207 of 2022