Dismissed¶19

Kritika Malhotra v. Senior Intelligence Officer

Madras HC14 May 2026CRL RC/74/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Madras High Court, CRL RC No.74 of 2026, decided 14-05-2026 by Justice P. Dhanabal; petitioner Kritika Malhotra (counsel Ms.S.Syba); respondent Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Chennai Zonal Unit, Chennai (Special Public Prosecutor Mr.N.P.Kumar); revision under Sections 438 and 442 of BNSS against order dated 01.09.2025 of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (E.O.1), Egmore, in Crl.MP.No.64 of 2025 in RR.No.06 of 2025 concerning permission to travel abroad; dismissed as withdrawn with endorsement; connected Crl.MP.No.913 of 2026 closed; no holdings, no precedents cited.

What the court decided

AI extract

Kritika Malhotra Vs Senior Intelligence Officer — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL RC No.74 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 14-05-2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶6

CRL RC NO. 74 OF 2026 AND CRL MP No. 913 of 2026

Kritika Malhotra

..Petitioner(s)

Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Chennai Zonal Unit, No.27, G.N. Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai-600017.

¶11

..Respondent(s)

¶12

Criminal Revision Case filed under Sections 438 and 442 of BNSS to call for the records in Crl.MP.No.64 of 2025 in RR.No.06 of 2025 on the file of the Learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court, (E.O.1) Egmore, Chennai and set aside the Impugned order dated 01.09.2025 passed by the Learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court (E.O.1), Egmore, Chennai and permit the petitioner to travel abroad without any restriction.

¶13

For Petitioner(s): Ms.S.Syba

¶14

For Respondent(s): Mr.N.P.Kumar Special Public Prosecutor for Central Government

¶15

__________ Page1 of 3

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CRL RC No.74 of 2026

¶18

ORDER

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision Case. She has also made an endorsement to that effect. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

14-05-2026

¶21

(2/2)

¶22

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶23

MKN

¶24

¶25