Dismissed¶21

Sathya Sheelan v. State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Jan 2026CRL RC/73/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of criminal revision petition; dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach Special Court; prayer to set aside order dated 13.06.2025 in Crl.M.P. No. 921 of 2025 (Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tambaram) and to direct registration of FIR on complaint dated 10.10.2024 to Chitlapakkam Police Station; filed under Section 438 r/w 442 BNSS; Madras High Court; Justice Sunder Mohan; decided 19.01.2026; advocates: B. Hari Krishnan (petitioner), R. Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side) (respondent).

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to approach the Special Court, if such a remedy is available in law. ¶21

Sathya Sheelan Vs State Rep.by its, The Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Crl.R.C. No. 73 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 19.01.2026

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN

¶6

Crl.R.C. No. 73 of 2026

¶7

Mr. Sathyaseelan, S/o. V. James, No. 19/3, 1^st Floor, VOC Nagar Main Road, Anna Nagar East, Chennai – 600 102. ..Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

State rep. By The Inspector of Police, Chitlapakkam Police Station, Chitlapakkam, Chennai. Tamil Nadu – 600 064. ..Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438 r/w 442 of

¶11

BNSS to set aside the order dated 13.06.2025 passed in Crl.M.P. No. 921 of 2025 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Tambaram and consequently direct the respondent Police to register an FIR based on the petitioner’s complaint dated 10.10.2024 and investigate the same in accordance with law.

¶12

1\5

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

Crl.R.C. No. 73 of 2026

¶15

For Petitioner :: Mr.B. Hari Krishnan For Respondent :: Mr.R. Vinothraja, Govt. Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶16

O R D E R

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of