Dismissed¶24

Gokulnath v. The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police

Madras HC3 Jun 2026CRL RC/1072/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CRL RC No. 1072 of 2026; High Court of Judicature at Madras; Shamim Ahmed, J.; decided 03-06-2026; Criminal Revision under Section 438 r/w. 442 of BNSS; dismissal as withdrawn; petition infructuous; interim custody of vehicle handed over; return of two wheeler PY-05-R-1753; Pulsar NS200; order dated 07.10.2025 in Crl.M.P.908/2025; Judicial Magistrate, Gingee, Villupuram District; Cr.No.43/2025; PE-Wing Gingee Police Station; petitioner Gokulnath S/o.Ilayaraja; respondent State through Inspector of Police; advocates T. Elumalai and M. Dinesh (Govt Advocate, Crl. Side).

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the criminal revision case; no substantive relief granted as the petition was dismissed as withdrawn without adjudication on merits. ¶24

Gokulnath Vs The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

CRL RC No. 1072 of 2026

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 03-06-2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED

¶5

CRL RC No. 1072 of 2026

¶6

Gokulnath S/o.Ilayaraja, No.396, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Kalithirampattu Village, Chellipattu Post, Vikravandi Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶7

..Petitioner(s)

¶8

¶9

The State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, PE-Wing Gingee Police Station, Villupuram. Cr.No.43/2025.

¶10

..Respondent(s)

¶11

Prayer: This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 438 r/w. 442 of BNSS, praying to call for the records and set aside the order passed on Crl.M.P.908/2025 on the file of the Judicial magistrate , Gingee, Villupuram District dated 07.10.2025 to return the two wheeler PY-05-R-1753.

¶12

For Petitioner(s): Mr.T.Elumalai For Respondent(s): Mr..M.Dinesh,Govt Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶13

ORDER

¶14

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr. T. Elumalai, learned

¶15

counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner has already received the property in question, i.e., the Pulsar NS200 two-wheeler bearing

¶16

Page1 of 4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

CRL RC No. 1072 of 2026

¶19

Registration No. PY-05-R-1753.

¶20

2.The learned counsel further submitted that since the interim custody of

¶21

the vehicle has already been handed over, the relief sought in the present revision case has become infructuous. Therefore, he submitted that he does not intend to press this criminal revision petition any further and requests permission of this Court to withdraw the same.

¶22

3.Mr. M. Dinesh, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

¶23

appearing for the respondent State, has no objection to the request made by the petitioner's counsel.

¶24

4.Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn. No further orders are required to be passed.

¶25

03-06-2026

¶26

Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶27

SHA

¶28

__________ Page2 of 4

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

CRL RC No. 1072 of 2026