R.Krithik Dev Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Siruganur

For Petitioner : Mr.R.J.Karthick, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS

¶12

PRAYER :-

¶13

C-38B. For Bail in Crime No.134/2026 on the file of the respondent police.

¶14

1/8

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

CRL OP(MD). No.9880 of 2026

¶17

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶18

The petitioner/A2, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.05.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) and 311 of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.134 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶19

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 16.05.2026, at about 02.25 a.m., while the defacto complainant was travelling on his two wheeler near Akkampatti Kallupuliyan kovil, he was intercepted by the accused persons and took him in a car bearing Registration No.TN 45 BU 9078. Thereafter, the petitioner and other accused persons threatened him with knife point and demanded money from him. Since the defacto complainant did not have any cash with him, the accused persons transferred a sum of Rs.1,22,400/- from the defacto complainant's 2/8

¶20

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶21

CRL OP(MD). No.9880 of 2026

¶22

mobile phone and took away his mobile phone and fled from the scene, leaving behind the key of the defacto complainant's two wheeler. Hence, the complaint.

¶23

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 17.05.2026. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶24

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police would submit that investigation in this case is still pending and the offences are grave in nature. He would further submit that the petitioner has no previous cases. However, he vehemently, opposed

¶25

3/8

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

CRL OP(MD). No.9880 of 2026

¶28

to grant of bail.

¶29

This Court heard both sides and perused

¶30

the materials available on record.

¶31

Considering the rival submissions made by

¶32

the learned counsel on either side, nature of

¶33

offence, and considering the fact that the petitioner has no previous cases and the petitioner is not a named accused in the FIR and also considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner from 17.05.2026, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶34

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is

¶35

ordered to be released on bail on

¶36

condition to execute a bond for a sum of

¶37

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only)

¶38

with two sureties each for a like sum to

¶39

the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

¶40

4/8

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

CRL OP(MD). No.9880 of 2026

¶43

Magistrate, Lalgudi, and on further

¶44

conditions that:

¶45

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m.,

¶46

until further orders.

¶47

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused, or suspected, or of

¶48

the commission of which she is suspected;

¶49

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶50

[e] the petitioner shall not directly

¶51

or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

¶52

her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

¶53

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial

¶54

5/8

¶55

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶56

CRL OP(MD). No.9880 of 2026

¶57

Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take

¶58

appropriate action against the petitioner

¶59

in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶60

absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered

¶61

under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 03.06.2026

VSG

6/8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis