Disposed

G.Rajakumari v. The State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC12 Mar 2026CRL OP(MD)/9551/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition seeking police intervention to stop respondents entering petitioner's land and to provide police protection to her life, limb and property. The court held land entry is a civil dispute for the civil court and directed police to consider a fresh application on life-and-limb threat perception.

What did the court decide?

Police directed to consider request for personal protection on a fresh application depending on threat perception; no police intervention ordered over land entry, referred to civil court.

G.Rajakumari Vs The State of Tamilnadu — Property and Title | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED: 12.03.2026

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.OP.(MD)No.9551 of 2025

G.Rajakumari

...Petitioner

1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District.

¶9

2.The Inspector of Police, Nakudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

¶10

3.V.Alagurasu

¶11

4.A.Revathi ... Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to prevent the respondents 3 and 4 from entering the petitioner's land and to provide Police protection to the petitioner's life, limb and property on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 22.05.2025 within the stipulated period which this Court may deem fit and proper.

¶13

1/4

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sridharan

¶16

For Respondents : Mr.A.Albert James Government Advocate (Crl Side) for R.1 & R.2

¶17

Mr.R.Paranjothi for M/s.KBS Law Office for R.3

¶18

No Appearance for R.4

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction as against the respondents 1 and 2 to prevent the respondents 3 and 4 from entering the petitioner's land and to provide Police protection to the petitioner's life, limb

¶21

and property on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 22.05.2025.

¶22

2.As far as the first part of the prayer is concerned, the respondents 3 and

¶23

4 prevented from the petitioner's land is purely a civil dispute and the Police cannot be directed to interfere in the civil dispute. It is only the competent civil Court that can decide the same.

¶24

3.As far as providing Police protection to the life and limb is concerned, depending upon the threat perception, the Police authorities are directed to consider the said request if a fresh application is filed. That apart, the question

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

of providing protection to the property of the petitioner does not arise. It is for the petitioner to move the civil Court.

¶28

4.With the aforesaid observations, this Criminal Original Petition is

¶29

disposed of.

¶30

12.03.2026

¶31

NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No MGA

¶32

¶33

1.1.The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District.

¶34

2.The Inspector of Police, Nakudi Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

¶35

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶36

3/4

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

¶39

MGA

¶40

Crl.OP.(MD)No.9551 of 2025

¶41

12.03.2026

¶42

4/4

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

G.Rajakumari v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Rajakumari v. The State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nishma Prathiba Vs S.Venkatesa Moorthi

T. Anitha Vs G.Jawaharlal

R.Thomas Vs v.Dakshinamoorthy

S.Shanmuga Sundaram Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Kathiravan @ Tambees Vs The Superintendent of Police, Theni

R. Sophanadevi Vs The State of Tamil nadu