P.K.Senthilkumar Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Gudalur South

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are in no way connected in the above said incident. They have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Due to previous dispute, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Counter case has also been registered against the defacto complainant. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners.

¶25

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that the offences are grave in nature. Due to previous dispute between the parties, the petitioners assaulted the defacto complainant. In which both parties have make complaint against each other. Hence, he vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Investigating is still pending. The injured

¶26

2/5

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7327 of 2026

¶29

sustained simple injuries and treated as out patient. There is no previous case against the petitioners.

¶30

Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶31

Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners, the injury sustained by the defacto complainant is simple in nature and the injured was treated as out patient, there is counter case also registered, the petitioner has no previous case, and also considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions:

¶32

[a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on

¶33

anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate,

¶34

Uthamapalayam, Theni District and on further conditions that:

¶35

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police

¶36

at 10.30 p.m., on every Saturday for a period of four weeks,

¶37

thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

¶38

[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar

¶39

3/5

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7327 of 2026

¶42

nature.

¶43

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation

¶44

or trial.

¶45

[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶46

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme

¶47

Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶48

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

(P D B J) 15.04.2026

TM

To