Murugesan Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Lalapet

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody for the offences punishable under Sections 281 and 105 of BNS, in Crime No.30 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶21

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner drove the bus in a rash and negligent manner and collided with the vehicle of the defacto complainant’s son. The defacto complainant’s son, daughter-in-law, and granddaughter sustained severe head injuries and died on the spot. Hence, the complaint.

¶22

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody. Hence, he seeks bail to the petitioner.

¶23

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioner drove the bus rashly and negligently, colliding with the defacto

¶24

2/6

¶25

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶26

CRL OP(MD). No.2874 of 2026

¶27

complainant’s son’s vehicle, resulting in the death of his son, daughter-in-law, and granddaughter due to severe head injuries. Therefore, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶28

Taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the period of incarceration suffered by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:

¶29

Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned District and Sessions Judge, Karur, and on further conditions that :-

¶30

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

¶31

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶32

3/6

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

CRL OP(MD). No.2874 of 2026

¶35

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶36

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶37

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶38

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(S S Y J) 12.02.2026

jbr

4/6

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

CRL OP(MD). No.2874 of 2026