Balavadivel Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Manachanallur

State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Manachanallur Police Station, Trichirapalli District. Crime No. 249 of 2026. ... Respondent/Complainant

¶10

PRAYER :-

¶11

For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 249 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶12

For Petitioner : R.Vignesh, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian, Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side)

¶13

ORDER

¶14

The petitioners apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under

¶15

1/6

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

CRL OP(MD). No.14080 of 2026

¶18

Sections 296(b), 115(2), 118(1) and 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023, and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.249 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail.

¶19

The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners are relatives of the defacto complainant and, due to a matrimonial dispute between the parties, the petitioners have attacked the defacto complainant and her family members with stones and sticks and caused severe injuries. Hence, the case has been registered.

¶20

The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that already counter case has been registered in Crime No.248 of 2026 against the defacto complainant and the injured was discharged from the hospital and no previous case is against the petitioners. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶21

The learned Counsel For State of TN (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and on instructions,

¶22

2/6

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

CRL OP(MD). No.14080 of 2026

¶25

submitted that the investigation is at preliminary stage. He would further submitted that A1 was already arrested and in custody and counter has also been registered against the defacto complainant and the injured was discharged from the hospital and the petitioners have no previous case. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

¶26

I have gone through the FIR and also the connected materials.

¶27

6.Considering the nature of allegations against the petitioners, and also considering the fact that counter has also been registered against the defacto complainant and the injured was discharged from the hospital and the petitioners have no previous case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to certain conditions.

¶28

[a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.3, Trichirapalli, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the

¶29

3/6

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

CRL OP(MD). No.14080 of 2026

¶32

learned Judicial Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

¶33

[b] the petitioners 1 & 2 shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of two weeks, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation ; the third petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m. for a period of one week, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation ;

¶34

[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

¶35

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

¶36

[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

¶37

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶38

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can

¶39

4/6

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

CRL OP(MD). No.14080 of 2026

¶42

be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

¶43

13.07.2026