Suresh Vs The State of Tamilnadu

custody on 05.06.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 24(1) and 6(a) of Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) and Section 77 of

¶21

1/6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12282 of 2026

¶24

the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, in Crime No.304 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

¶25

The case of the prosecution is that on the vehicle check up the respondent police found that the petitioner is having 85.700 kilograms of tobacco products with an intention to sell the same near a School campus. Hence, the case.

¶26

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prayed bail for the petitioner.

¶27

The learned Government Advocate (crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the offence are grave in nature. The quantity of contraband is huge quantity. The petitioner has 7 previous cases, not similar in nature. Investigation is still pending. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶28

This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on

¶29

2/6

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12282 of 2026

¶32

record.

¶33

Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, considering the nature of charges levelled against the petitioner, considering the quantity involved in this case and though the petitioner has 7 previous cases, they are not similar in nature and in all those cases, he was granted bail and considering the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions:

¶34

[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri , and on further conditions that:

¶35

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days, thereafter as and when required for interrogation:

¶36

[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected;

¶37

3/6

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.12282 of 2026

¶40

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation

¶41

or trial;

¶42

[e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the

¶43

Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

¶44

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 51730].

¶45

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 25.06.2026

TM

To