Allowed

Karuppasamypandi @ Kattepedi v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sivakasi Town

Madras HC19 Jun 2026CRL OP(MD)/11611/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted bail to petitioners accused of criminal intimidation and raising accelerators. Considering the lack of injury and previous bail history, the court released them subject to strict conditions, including daily reporting and a bond.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on condition to execute a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties each and report daily at 10.30 a.m. for thirty days.

Karuppasamypandi @ Kattepedi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By… — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

CRL OP(MD). No.11611 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 19/06/2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.11611 of 2026

¶8

Karuppasamypandi @ Kattepedi

¶9

P.Maruthupandi

¶10

P.Selvam

¶11

... Petitioners/Accused

¶12

¶13

State of Tamilnadu Rep by Inspector of Police, Sivakasi Town Police Station, Virudhunagar District. (Crime No. 227 of 2026).

¶14

... Respondent/Complainant

¶15

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Dinesh,

¶16

For Respondent : Mr.G.Ganesh Kumar,

¶17

Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶18

PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS

¶19

PRAYER :-

¶20

For Bail in Crime No. 227 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police.

¶21

1/6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

CRL OP(MD). No.11611 of 2026

¶24

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶25

The petitioners / Accused, who were arrested and remanded

¶26

to judicial custody on 07.05.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3) of BNS and Section 25(1-A) of Arms Act in Crime No. 227 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

¶27

The case of the prosecution is that on 28.04.2026 at about 12.15 hours, when the defacto complainant was proceedings to his house, the accused persons came behind him with dangerous weapons and criminally intimidated him and further some of the accused also raised accelerator of their vehicles. Hence the case.

¶28

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and they were falsely implicated in this case and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the petitioners have been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.05.2026. Therefore, prayed to grant bail for the petitioners.

¶29

2/6

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

CRL OP(MD). No.11611 of 2026

¶32

The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, the case has been registered against the accused persons. The petitioners have previous cases. He would further submit that the investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature and hence, he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioners.

¶33

This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

¶34

6.Considering the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, the nature of the offence and the fact that nobody injured in this case and further considering the fact that though the petitioners have previous cases to their credit, they have already been granted bail in those cases, as well as taking into account of the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions:

¶35

3/6

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

CRL OP(MD). No.11611 of 2026

¶38

[a] Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is

¶39

allowed and the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Sivakasi , and on further conditions that:

¶40

[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of thirty days, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

¶41

[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which they are suspected;

¶42

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶43

[e] the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

¶44

4/6

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

CRL OP(MD). No.11611 of 2026

¶47

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the

¶48

learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

¶49

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can

¶50

be registered under Section 269 BNS.

(P D B J) 19.06.2026

PNM