Disposed¶22

Nanthaprabhakaran v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Ramanatham

Madras HC8 Jun 2026CRL OP(MD)/10446/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail S.482 BNSS; Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10446 of 2026; Madurai Bench of Madras High Court; P. Dhanabal J.; decided 08.06.2026; no case registered against petitioners; petition enquiry pending on complaint of police-official defacto complainant over money transactions; direction to respondent police to complete enquiry within fifteen days; police to act on higher authorities' Circular regarding money transactions; petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Respondent police directed to complete the pending petition enquiry within fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of the order, in accordance with law; anticipatory bail neither granted nor refused. ¶22

Nanthaprabhakaran Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of… — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2026)

¶1

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10446 of 2026

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶4

Date : 08.06.2026

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL

¶7

CRL OP(MD). No.10446 of 2026

¶8

1.Nanthaprabhakaran 2.Rajapriya 3.Indhira

¶9

...Petitioners

¶10

¶11

The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by The Inspector of Police, B2-Bazaar Police Station, Ramanathapuram Town, Ramanathapuram District. Crime No.Not known of 2026. ...Respondent/Complainant

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.D.Balamurugapandi Advocate For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side)

¶13

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS

¶14

PRAYER :-

¶15

For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. Not known of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

¶16

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

¶17

1/4

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10446 of 2026

¶20

When the matter is taken up for hearing, both side counsels present. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that there is money dispute between the parties. Already the petitioner borrowed money from the defacto complainant and the same was also repaid. However, since the defacto complainant is one of police officials, by misusing the power now they are harassing the petitioner.

¶21

2.The learned Counsel appearing for the State would submit that no case has been registered against the petitioner. However, on the basis of the complaint lodged by the defacto complainant, the petition enquiry is pending and they will complete the enquiry within a period of fifteen days.

¶22

3.Recording the submission made by the learned Counsel appearing for the State this criminal original petition stands disposed of by directing the respondent to complete the enquiry within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt a copy of this order in accordance with law.

¶23

4.It is needless to mention that in respect of the money transactions the respondent police has to act upon the Circular issued by their Higher Authorities.

(P D B J) 08.06.2026

2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10446 of 2026

¶29

¶30